2005/10/28, Herbert Poetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 04:06:29PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote: > > On Friday 28 October 2005 15:45, Herbert Poetzl wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 10:56:58PM +0200, Grzegorz Nosek wrote: > > > > Hello all, > > > > > > > > I have noticed a disturbing pattern on my smp systems with vserver > > > > patches (2.6.13.4 with vserver patches from gentoo). > > > > > > as you said, you are using the gentoo (devel) > > > > please specify the gentoo portage version of vserver-sources, 2.6.13.4 > > does not necessarily mean it's devel > > ah, sorry, got the impression that gentoo was using > the devel branch only ... is there a list of versions > out there and to what mainstream versions they are > related? > > > additionally, vserver-sources does not have 2.6.13.4 in any version > > number... the default gentoo kernels do not show the fourth version > > element, and we stopped it for vserver-sources too (although > > 2.0.1_pre2 has 2.6.13.1 as version number, it's a (cosmetic) bug...) > > as far as I remember, the newer versions should include > the vserver patch version plus some gentoo marker, no? > (at least we agreed upon that :) > > TIA, > Herbert >
I'm not using Gentoo, so I cannot relate my kernel to any Gentoo release version. I downloaded a vanilla kernel and applied the patch found in the Gentoo package (there were two or three trivial conflicts) Best regards, Grzegorz Nosek _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list [email protected] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
