On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 08:38:19AM -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > Quoting Rik van Riel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, Herbert Poetzl wrote: > > > > > Well, as the OpenVZ folks announced their release on LKML > > > I just decided to do similar for the Linux-VServer release, > > > so please let me know if that is not considered appropriate. > > > > Since there is a legitimate (and very popular) use case for > > virtuozzo / vserver functionality, I think it is a good > > thing to get all the code out in the open. > > > > I really hope we will get something like BSD jail functionality > > in the Linux kernel. It makes perfect sense for hosting > > environments. > > Well a version for 2.6.15-rc2 is still at sf.net/projects/linuxjail. > I haven't resubmitted to lkml in a long time because I haven't found > or implemented a better solution for the network virtualization, which > Christoph wasn't happy with. The vserver ngnet or openvz networking > may be a good solution. Additionally, the pid virtualization we've > been discussing (and which should be submitted soon) would remove the > need for the tasklookup patch, so bsdjail would reduce even further, > to network and simple access controls.
complete pid virtualization would be interesting for migration and checkpointing too (not just isolation and security), so I think that might be something of interest for a broader audience ... best, Herbert > Note that I would prefer to see the full vserver in the kernel... > > -serge > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list [email protected] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
