This seems to become a logo contest... ;) I suggest to start a regular logo competition with a fixed submission date for all drafts, a defined submission process (by email/HTTP upload/etc.) so an overview can be created and rules for a ballot committee (certain persons? an open community voting? opoll on the ml?) and the aspects to assess, etc..
I would recommend a 4-stage process: 1. Open community poll, every person may elect its 3 favorites and gives reasons, why he/she chose those 3 drafts. 2. The top 10 logos are published and get in extensive review and public opinion, especially also for legal reasons such as trademark right or evident similarities with other logos or artwork. This should be done by the whole community. 3. A chosen committee assesses the top 10 logos in respect to defined, weighted common criteria (personal view on layout, symbolism, recall value, uniqueness, known possible legal problems, etc.) in consideration of the results from stage 2. 4. The results of stage 3 are evaluated, if the choice is not clear cut, a second open discussion on the top candidates may be initiated and results be evaluated by the committee again. [5. We have a logo.] So the question would only be how to choose the committee and how many members it should have. Persons could either be proposed and elected by the community or the maintainers pick up persons or you take the hall of fame people or whatever you can imagine... ;) Regards, // Veit
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list [email protected] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
