On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 05:11:55PM -0500, micah wrote: > In gmane.linux.vserver, you wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 02:29:38PM -0500, Micah Anderson wrote: > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > >> Hash: SHA1 > >> > >> Herbert Poetzl wrote: > >> > On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 09:33:12AM +0100, Joel Soete wrote: > >> >>On toh for my private build from upstream src (on going to build latest > >> >>0.30.210), I disabled use of dietlibc (not yet available for hppa at this > >> >>time) and all seems to works fine. > >> > > >> > > >> > really depends on the dietlibc, but I'd assume it > >> > is _still_ broken on HPPA, nevertheless the glibc > >> > is _not_ a good alternative, although it _might_ > >> > work for simple things. > >> > >> I guess we can find out when Joel sends results of tests? > > > > possible, well, testme and testfs will not > > detect the insecurities introduced by glibc > > Ah, I meant we can find out if dietlibc is broken on HPPA or not. I > did not mean we can find out if glibc insecurities still exist.
hmm, well, then see: http://list.linux-vserver.org/archive/vserver/msg12138.html > >> > PS: I hope that dietlibc on hppa will be fixed soon. > >> > >> Have the issues on HPPA been brought to the dietlibc developers? > > > > yes, but AFAICT, they were ignored ... > > I tried to google around for references to this to see if I could help > push these up, but didn't find anything. Sometimes all it takes is a > ping to the right place to get people to realise that they overlooked > something. please do so if possible :) TIA, Herbert > Micah > _______________________________________________ > Vserver mailing list > [email protected] > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list [email protected] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
