On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 09:19:25PM +0100, Roman Pretory wrote: > First Thanks for Help
you're welcome! > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Herbert Poetzl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 08. März 2006 19:48 > An: Roman Pretory > Cc: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: [Vserver] Network, Shapping, util > > > On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 04:34:06PM +0100, Roman Pretory wrote: > > Hello > > > > A lot of Questions.... :-) > > Maybe one have answers or ideas > > > > Thanks Roman > > > > > #=========================================================================== > > ==================== > > > > 1) seperate Network on node > > > > have a node with 2 nics > > > > eth0 is 192.168.2.2/255.255.255.0 connected to Zywall LAN-Interface > > eth1 is 10.0.0.1/255.255.255.0 connected to Zywall DMZ-Interface > > > > How to seperate the vservers to be only in DMZ /LAN without lossing > > the connection to Internen (Gateway) and be shure that no connact is > > possibe from LAN to DMZ over the Node > > > > and able to connect server vom LAn in the DMZ > > > > Have played a long time with iptables and networkconfigs no idea left > > to test :-( > > http://archives.linux-vserver.org/200311/0470.html > > from http://linux-vserver.org/Documentation (Archived Knowledge) > > It will Help > Thanks > > > > #=========================================================================== > > ==================== > > > > 2) Shapping CPU / set limit on CPU > > > > is it possible to give a vserver only 50% of the cpu or better to > > give 10% fix and if free more or up to xx% like cir/eir > > http://linux-vserver.org/Scheduler+Parameters > > (same source, Howtos) > > latest devel versions support setting two pairs of > scheduler parameters, one for the 'guarantee' and > another one for the idle case, which allows to utilize > otherwise unused cpu resources > > devel?! > how long you think for stabil well, as soon as it is well tested and considered stable (which I think should not take too long for the scheduler changes) > is it usable only with util or also with Vserver hmm, I assume that question was regarding tools, so the answer here is, yes you can use it with _any_ tools, as long as they support the api ... > I need it for produktion use > > is there a group for beta testing is there a > place free or could i help?! testing is always welcome, reporting back even more :) folks usually decide for devel or stable according to their personal preference, while experimental, the third branch/category is only for the bold ones, unless it is a release candidate series as we have for 2.0.2 and 2.1.1 right now ... usually devel has a bunch of nice features, but might break somewhere and/or have small issues (which will get fixed as soon as they are reported back), while the stable branch is thoroughly tested before it is released and should be clean ... > #=========================================================================== > > ==================== > > > > 3) traffice shaping > > > > have anyone a working howto already testet and running in production mode > > seperate node, vservers and services per vserver/node > > TC is your friend here ... > > > Thanks I have already meet "him" :-) > Only need Infos of Produktion experiences, to make not errors twice i.c. guess folks can help here ... > #=========================================================================== > > ==================== > > > > 4) move from vserver: 0.40 to util-vserver > > > > exist a howto?? > > convert vserver possible --without loosing anything > > <http://www.13thfloor.at/vserver/d_rel26/v1.9.1/util-vserver-0.29.5.tar> > > hmm, you probably want util-vserver 0.30.210, the config > is described on the FlowerPage (referenced on the main page) > and probably the simplest way to 'upgrade' the config is > one of the scripts floating around to do that, or alternatively > the -m skeleton build method which should be quite simple > to use to get a new config ... > > HTH, > Herbert > > NO I don`t but if I read the pages > (http://www.13thfloor.at/vserver/s_rel26/v2.01/) > there is no info about vserver only util > so I think this is the future or the better way, is it?? the util-vserver tools have become quite stable, and they are currently considered the 'safe' way to go ... > or is vserver so good as > > as i testet maybe by version patch 28 for kernel 2.4.xx util make a > lot of troubles I can't get it to run clean, sounds like it was a long time ago, anyway, any tools which WorkForYou(tm) are fine, may they be from Jack or Enrico or recently Hollow/Bonbons, just make sure that they support what you want and that somebody cares about fixing issues you encounter ... > vservers works there are rpm so no wish by install perfect > > Thanks > Roman best, Herbert > #=========================================================================== > > ==================== > > > > Config: > > > > Kernel: 2.6.12.3 / 2.6.14.7 > > patch: 2.0 / 2.01 > > vserver: 0.40 > > node:fc3 > > hosts rh 9/fc1-3 /debian > > > > > #=========================================================================== > > ==================== _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list [email protected] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
