On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 02:36:58PM -0400, Patrick Conroy wrote: > On 4/18/06, Herbert Poetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > I'd say it _is_ possible, but it would require some modifications > > so that the 'migration' is context aware, shouldn't be too hard > > to add that though, but currently there is no real demand for > > that (at least I think so) > > > > best, > > Herbert > > Herbert, > > Thanks for your response. Is it simply a matter of making the > vserver patch apply to the (already-patched) OpenSSI kernel, > or am I missing the bigger picture?
well, yes and no, of course you have to make the context related structures move across nodes too, and you will probably have to adjust a few things to make it really work ... > Are other people handling scalability and high-availability > differently? it seems so, at least the requests for *mosix style distribution is not very hight, guess different hosts with some kind of failover are much simpler to handle ... > It seems that being able to put vservers on top an openSSI > (or some other) cluster would be great way to handle this. sure, and if you are interested in testing this, then I would be willing to help you handle the kernel side ... if so, then maybe pay a visit to the irc channel (#vserver @ irc.oftc.net) and have a chat about the details ... best, Herbert > Thanks, > Patrick > _______________________________________________ > Vserver mailing list > [email protected] > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list [email protected] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
