hello everybody

Thank you for the excellent job you're all doing with vservers !

Le 23 avr. 06, à 11:44, Oliver Welter a écrit :

Hi Folks,

I'm agree, I've prefered the old vserver style to configure with one file per vserver like in freevps
Moreover most of  Linux program use only one file to config ...
I don't see where is easier to maintain it ? ...

I am using Vservers daily ;-) but I create new ones once every three months only. So I'm perpetually a newby there. I can confirm that new style config is just beginner's nightmare. Time to understand the great flower page is ten times what's needed to create a vserver. Wouldn't it be great if someone who knows proposes a script to translate an old-style file to a new-style tree ? may be it already exists ? And sorry to be so stupid : how do you adapt the GFP css ? So far I have to use lynx to read it ;-)

It's much easier to deploy and modfiy the configuration on this basis when using automated scripts...I use vserver to implement some failover stuff and unfortunately the boxes differ sligthly - this way its much easier to sync only certain files, and ignore others. Besides it is easier to just put some own config stuff vor own scripts.
So I prefer this style as it is easier to manage by scripts
I'm dealing with failover intensively too. In any case of failover (automated or manual) I have to check that configuration is exactly replicated and up-to-date on all nodes (usually four or five nodes), else I disable failover. So I used to check versionning information hard-coded in comments of all configuration files that matter, in particular vserver config. I'm quite puzzled to do so with the new style config.

Hope this helps
Dominique
SISalp.org


_______________________________________________
Vserver mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver

Reply via email to