On Monday 11 September 2006 19:23, Chuck wrote: > On Monday 11 September 2006 13:15, Benedikt Böhm wrote: > > ok cool. thanks... i have a question tho.. i am confused... > > we are currently using 2.6.13.3-vs2.1.0-rc4 on some of our machines from > last december or so... > > other newer ones we installed 2.6.15-vs2.0.1-gentoo-r5. does this mean > that the earlier ones using 2.1.0 have more fixes and options .. ie.. a > 'higher version' than the 2.0.1? > > or has that particular 2.1 been 'grandfathered' into the 2.0.x ?
well, fixes go into both series, but new major features will only be added to 2.1 > > > On Monday 11 September 2006 19:03, Chuck wrote: > > > i remember reading a bit ago that version 2.1 has gone production.. > > > > this has not happened yet, curent stable is 2.0.2, released on september > > 3rd > > > > > when will that be integrated into gentoo's vserver-sources portage > > > group? > > > > you can find all rc* kernels in our overlay at > > http://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/vps > > > > > or should i just do the kernel manually... i have to set up a new host > > next > > > > week and wanted to use the latest and greatest stable sources. > > > > > > currently, what is available is vserver-sources-2.0.1-r5 > > > > vserver-sources-2.0.2 is in portage, still ~arch for the "required" > > minimum > > of > > > 30 days until going stable > > > > HTH, > > Bene > > _______________________________________________ > > Vserver mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list [email protected] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
