On Fri December 1 2006 22:56, Chuck wrote: > On Friday 01 December 2006 21:51, Michael S. Zick wrote: > > i installed this new kernel, and decided to reboot immediately. there is a > CONSIDERABLE difference in the amount of initial memory used! i have never > seen this machine this low before. 680mb. typically startup memory has always > been around 900mb. >
Super! > there is also a noticable difference in the response of the machine.. time > will tell. > A personal record: 2.6.18.2 is the only kernel that ever trashed my reiserfs. I have been beating on 2.6.18.3 for over a week now with no problems found. > thanks for the info! > > i still need to find out if i need to set file handles higher etc, and how to > do that. > I do not have a clue to that question. Someone on the list that is running a high resource requirement installation will have to comment on that. > Mike _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list [email protected] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
