On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 04:40:22PM +0100, Daniel Hokka Zakrisson wrote: > Sheldon Knight wrote: > > > > > >I have just built and successfully run a Redhat Linux 2.6.18.3 vserver > >vs2.1.1.2 patched kernel and installed util-vserver-0.30.210 tools. > > When I ran testme.sh I go the following output. What have I missed? > > More specifically, how on earth did you manage to get this? I.e. what > commands did you use? > Also, why did you go with an old version of the tools?
please try to get 0.30.211 or 0.30.212-rc* > > Use dietlibc: no (you have been warned) > > You really should install dietlibc and use that. indeed, most issues go away when compiled with dietlibc > > Available APIs: > >legacy,compat,v11,fscompat,v13obs,v13,net,oldproc,olduts > > How did you manage to build the legacy API? I haven't been able to build > that for a while. > > > build/host: > > x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu > >... > > syscall(2) invocation: traditional > > > > vserver(2) syscall#: 273/glibc > > Well, this is wrong. First of all, you probably should use the > alternative or at least fast syscall invocation. Secondly, the syscall > number is 236 on x86_64. How you got these values is beyond me, only > thing I can think of is something like a mix of x86 and x86_64. yep, it would be correct for 32bit tools (on x86 and x86_64) but the arch/build/host shows a 64bit (x86_64) environment best, Herbert > -- > Daniel Hokka Zakrisson > GPG id: 06723412 > GPG fingerprint: A455 4DF3 990A 431F FECA 7947 6136 DDA2 0672 3412 > _______________________________________________ > Vserver mailing list > [email protected] > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list [email protected] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
