Herbert Poetzl wrote: > On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 04:30:33PM +0100, Jon Bendtsen wrote:
[cut] > > 3, because i'm using software raid as well... > > I would not draw too many conclusions from that > as well, because if you take a closer look, you'll > probably find a dozen of things these systems have > in common ... > > - using IDE drives? i do > - using ext2/ext3? i do > - patched with ctx-NN ;) The latest when i did it a few days ago > - SMP /non SMP? smp > also check for features introduced/included/selected > in the kernels ... true > the minimum you would need to make some minimum > cross relation would be > > - all kernel configurations > - the distributions/configurations > - I/O modules active (MD, LVM, IDE, SCSI, ...) > - memory/harddisk configurations > > Nevertheless I am sure the information is there, > and if it can be combined/evaluated maybe one > or the other cause/bug could be found ... > (although I doubt, that this will become reality, > because nobody would give out access to all his > configuration/logging information ...) I would, because it's my home machine. I'd even give a develloper a login if it's needed. I find it annoying i have to reset it once in a while. > PS: SMP machines perform _MUCH_ better as physical > vserver hosts than non-SMP machines. I had otherwise > identical machines in production, and the SMP machine > was more than 10 times faster, regarding the response > time to connections/logins/etc ... thought so JonB
