On Tue, 3 Dec 2002 16:43:03 -0500, Paul Sladen wrote > On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, John Goerzen wrote: > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jacques Gelinas >wrote: > > > -We also need private network loopback devices. > > we need a way to have vservers communicate with each other internally > > using TCP/IP. They already can, thanks to the kernel's dummy driver. > > No. Currently the `lo' loopback device looks like a shared peice of > ethernet. Eg: any vserver can see the private traffic going across the > loopback from any other vserver context.
Not exactly, although there is a bug in udp. 127.0.0.1 is rewritten to the first IP of IPROOT. So 127.0.0.1 does not really exist in a vserver. A vserver can't reach a service in the root service bound to 127.0.0.1 for example. If it can, it is a bug --------------------------------------------------------- Jacques Gelinas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> vserver: run general purpose virtual servers on one box, full speed! http://www.solucorp.qc.ca/miscprj/s_context.hc
