On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 01:11:04PM -0500, Matt Ayres wrote: > Well, i'm already aware of both of these and am already using a > pre-emptive kernel. Due to the changes it looks like the only way to do > this quickly is just to remove the 'sched' code from the patch.
- are you interested in collaborating on this issue? - if so, maybe we should contact Alexey Lyashkov? - I would like to see per VS memory limits in CTX-15 (Alexey seems to have done that) best, Herbert > -- > Thanks anyway, > Matt > > > On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Herbert Poetzl wrote: > > > On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 03:27:48AM -0500, Matt Ayres wrote: > > > So i'm running into a situation here. I have a server running quite a few > > > virtual servers with over 1000 processes on the host server. I am > > > experiencing some performance problems, not so much on the virtual servers > > > but any type of cpu intensive operation on the host server causes severe > > > load. > > > > have a look at ... > > > > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml/sched/ingo-O1/ > > > > but in your case, I would also take a look at ... > > > > http://www.tech9.net/rml/linux/ > > > > best, > > Herbert > > > > > I know Lyashkov Alexey has ported the Vserver patch to work with RedHat > > > 7.3 and the O(1) scheduler. Has anyone put any consideration or already > > > done work to make a vserver+O(1) patch available for the official kernel? > > > > > > I'm going to try to attempt this using Lyashkov's as a base however I > > > havn't used C in quite some years and have yet to do any kernel hacking :P > > > > > > -- > > > Thanks, > > > Matt Ayres > >
