On Thursday 10 July 2003 05:33, Herbert P�tzl wrote: > On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 02:12:31AM +0100, Sam Vilain wrote: > > I've done some categorizing of Alexey's > rh-kernel-2.4.18-la-1054303950/ by splitting > up each hunk into a directory/filename combo > and manually reviewing and categorizing each > of those parts ... I guess it is outdated. i create patch for up to 1056256121 and add vps diskquota but not have time for test and fix some problems. If anybody have time to test and fix i can send this patchset.
> > > > I don't know if you've come across this before, but if you supply the > > -D DEFINENAME option to `patch', it will insert C-like #ifdef > > DEFINENAME statements around each change to the source code. This can > > assist in creating kernel Configure options for the code. > > and I'm 100% sure that nobody around Linus or > Linus himself will accept a patch with 200++ #ifdefs, > I wouldn't either ... i think it add up 1-2Mbytes to kernel source code and need add to kernel some patches. > > > From my point of view, the following issues > still have to be addressed ... > > - separation of namespace disk namespace ? - done. snapshot send to testers. > - complete virtual network (no alias stuff) done without packet scheduler. > - complete virtual capability set hm.. what it`s ? > - virtualized pids/pgs/[tp]tys hm. i thinks not need wirtualize pids - but need change for_each_task to for_each_task_in_context. > - real init task (a bonus of the previous) hm.. what problem with --fakeinit ? > - a good resource limit solution > - advanced scheduler (virtual) for CPU QoS per context ? > - a really good quota solution ;) > -- With best regards, Alex
