On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 10:32:15AM +0200, Dariush Pietrzak wrote: > Is anyone preparing patches/patchsets against AC kernels? > i get conflicts in kernel/sched.c kernel/exit.c, and I think I won't be > able to correctly resolve those with my level of expertise.
the big (and only) issue is the O(1) scheduler, which has no ctx17 equivalent yet ... > I am trying to get those features into my kernels: > XFS + FreeSWAN + CIPE + Sensors ( + of course ctx17 ), XFS doesn't have a working Immutable-Link-Inversion, CIPE shouldn't be such a hazzle, and sensors are included in my patchsets since Idonotknowwhenanymore ... anyway, the encryption stuff will drastically change in the next few months ... I guess > and it seems like i'm alone in this pursuit, because everyone and their > mother starts from including preemptive+low latency.(+o(1)). so this means you dislike the above? hmm, well low latency already made it into 2.4.22-pre3 and preemption as well as O(1) are in 2.5 and certainly will be there in 2.6 ... HTH, Herbert
