On Sat, Jul 19, 2003 at 12:57:06AM -0400, Alejandro Mery wrote: > Herbert P�tzl wrote: > > >On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 09:46:26PM -0400, Alejandro Mery Pellegrini wrote: > > > > > >>>Herbert P�tzl wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>>On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 09:28:04PM -0400, Alejandro Mery wrote: > >>>>will ctx-18 support JFS? > >>>> > >>>> > >what does 'supporting jfs' mean for _you_ > >(do _you_ consider it supported if ...) > > > >- the kernel can be compiled with jfs enabled? > >- the kernel woks with jfs and on jfs partitions? > >- immutable linkage invert is supported (unification)? > >- quota (virtual) is supported on jfs? > > > >so you are supposed to choose one, and I am > >then entitled to answer, 'yes of course', or > >'sorry dude, that won't work' *grin* ... > > > > > well... the question was: > can the kernel be *succesfully* compiled with jfs enabled? what didn't > happend a couple of month ago...
hope this will be fixed ... > i assumed vquota patch was fs independent... but now i guess it isn't.. > same about unification :-( > are vquota and unification supported on jfs? sorry dude, but I guess not in this release ;) ... best, Herbert > > Regards, > Alejandro Mery
