On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 01:32:05PM -0400, Matt Ayres wrote: > On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 13:28, Herbert P�tzl wrote: > > Hi Matt! > > > > > hmm, atomics should be 26bit ... maybe a 32bit value > > guarded by a semaphore or something? > > > > According to the docs they are 32-bit, but only guaranteed useful up to > 24-bit. > > > > I've tried to convince him to change it to 64-bit (I think that > > > would make it a 1200GB limit) but he seems set on using the atomic > > > value. > > > > you are talking about total vserver disk limit > > not per user/group disk quotas, are you? > > > > Yes, total vserver disk limit, you are not? :) After reading your post, > I could see how we could be talking about two different things. I read > 'per vserver context quota' and assumed it meant a 'context quota'.
no, per vserver uid/gid quota is the current implementation we had the total context quota a time ago, and decided to call this vserver "virtual" disk limit ... this will be in my new patches too as soon as they are stable and I guess without the limitations described ... > > best, > > Herbert > -- > Matt Ayres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > TekTonic
