On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 02:14:25PM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote: > On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Herbert Poetzl wrote: > > > is there any interest in VM (virtual memory) > > limitations for vserver a'la Jacques? > > Yes, absolutely. However, I think we should simply > re-use the CKRM infrastructure for that, instead of > reinventing the wheel.
I asked them, if they would do anything for 2.4.x but they told me ... "Not at this point. We are targetting CKRM for the 2.7 mainline kernel so only a backport to 2.6 would be needed." anyway, I guess I figured out how Jacques was planning to extend the rlimit to other areas besides the 'nproc' feature ... so I thought maybe we could add the missing features for 2.4 and take a better approach for 2.6 ... you know a lot more than I about virtual memory, so if I publish a patch for the vm limitation, could you be so kind and verify it? TIA, Herbert
