* Rik van Riel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Chris Wright wrote: > > * James Morris ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > I think virtualization is important/useful enough to warrant an API of > > > it's own. It could be similar to LSM, e.g. allow pluggable > > > virtualization modules, with no cost for the base kernel. > > > > Doesn't sound like 2.6 material. > > Maybe not, but it does sound like something we want to be > ready by the time 2.7 is forked ;)
Yes, good point ;-) And I do agree it's a useful concept. -- Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net
