Hi Toby,
I am working on a couple of the outstanding 0.10 tickets now and hope
to get a "release candidate" for it released soon.
Sorry for not helping out on the 0.10 branch. I'm kind of
counterproductive if I push the pin_handler branch forward ;-).
We moved our office last week and I wanted to take the chance to make
everything better in the next office. Therefore I wanted to have a
functional conversion of our archive, which seems to be fullfilled right
now.
At that point I think it would be a good idea to move 0.10 development
to a branch, and merge your pin_handler branch to the trunk, since it
will be the basis of the next release. Sound like a good plan?
I think it is a good idea. 0.10 is good for simply archives. It leaves
to many lags for the more complicated ones.
So, if my pin_handler branch is working for most people here on the
list, I'm would be even willing to skip 0.10.
Best regards
Dirk
_______________________________________________
vss2svn-users mailing list
Project homepage:
http://www.pumacode.org/projects/vss2svn/
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Admin:
http://lists.pumacode.org/mailman/listinfo/vss2svn-users-lists.pumacode.org
Mailing list web interface (with searchable archives):
http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.vss2svn.user
