Hi Toby

Sounds good. Actually I was thinking about just going full-bore and issuing a 1.0 release. I think that most of the major issues that most users would encounter when converting their repo have been solved, and I don't really see us adding any major new features unless someone else decides to take over. I first need to go through the ticket list again and see if there are any major issues that still need resolved. What do you think?

I have a few more pending local changes that are new features, but which are very interesting:

* fine grained label mapping support
* better detection of UNPIN/PIN activities
* detection of comments in UNPIN/PIN activities
* omit commits if PIN/UNPIN does not change update the state of the file
* Handle PIN/UNPIN as commits and not as copy from activities.
* don't break recursive SHARE/PIN activities into multiple revisions.

All these changes will give a much better history of the converted archive. In my opinion this should go into a 1.0 version.

I will do my very best to go through my issues this week. Beginning at the end of this week, I will be very busy again with other task, so I don't expect to have any more time to contribute to this project again for some amount of time.

Dirk

_______________________________________________
vss2svn-users mailing list
Project homepage:
http://www.pumacode.org/projects/vss2svn/
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Admin:
http://lists.pumacode.org/mailman/listinfo/vss2svn-users-lists.pumacode.org
Mailing list web interface (with searchable archives):
http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.vss2svn.user

Reply via email to