Maybe it does something silly like assume sizeof(int) = 4 bytes? I don't know,
on modern compilers was the decision made that int should become 8 bytes (64
bits wide)? I know that size of pointers would have to change, but if it is
trying to do IO based on pointer sizes that would be really out there.
Jason
David Blaikie wrote:
my mistake - ssphys has the problem...
On Nov 30, 2007 4:15 PM, David Blaikie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
eek. This is the same error I was going to bring up next - the
error I got when migrating a small database! Looks like I'm out of
luck, then!
Anyone have any idea why this should be so? Why should vss2svn have
trouble on 64?
David
_______________________________________________
vss2svn-users mailing list
Project homepage:
http://www.pumacode.org/projects/vss2svn/
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Admin:
http://lists.pumacode.org/mailman/listinfo/vss2svn-users-lists.pumacode.org
Mailing list web interface (with searchable archives):
http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.vss2svn.user
