Yes, I went ahead add added these exceptions to the Abstract classes.
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:29 PM, Till Westmann <[email protected]> wrote: > Would it be possible to special-case this in the > AbstractNegatingComparisonOperation? > Otherwise it seems to be that we would need to special-case this in the > subclasses of AbstractNegatingComparisonOperation by overriding the > corresponding operate... methods. > > Does this make sense? > > Cheers, > Till > > On Aug 22, 2012, at 1:37 PM, Eldon Carman wrote: > >> In the case where double or float hold a "NaN" value the result for >> both less than and greater than is false. Currently the way of >> determining greater than is the opposite of the less than and equal >> result. For when NaN is one of the values this does not work. How >> would you suggest we address this issue? >
