Here's a couple of examples of LICENSE files with other licenses mentioned after the AL:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/tags/2.4.6/LICENSE https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/tags/2.0/LICENSE Its fine to include wording explaining that it only applies to a specific test file. Think i agree with you about the NOTICE text not being needed. We could clarify that on legal-discuss@ but i'm not sure its necessary until someone objects to doing it like this. On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 12:38 AM, Till <[email protected]> wrote: > Ok, I'll put the license in and create a new release candidate. > But I've got a few questions on how to do that: > According to 4.2 b it seems that it's good enough if we put the URI of the > license in. > Is this good enough from an Apache point of view as well? > Also, would the LICENSE file contain wording which license applies to > which part > of the release? > (Do you maybe know of a good example of a LICENSE file that contains more > than > one license?) > > I think that 4.3 applies to products that use and expose the content of the > database that is being licensed. > Since we use it only for testing, I think that this does not apply to us, > but > IANAL. > > Till > > > ant elder <[email protected] > > hat am 3. Oktober 2013 um 01:09 geschrieben: > > > > > > > I think that license is going to need to be included in the VXQuery LICENSE > > > file then. I'm not sure i understand what 4.3 is saying in the 2nd sentence > > starting "However...", so if you can work it out consider if that text in > > 4.3a of the license should be included in the VXQuery NOTICE file. > > > > ...ant > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Vinayak Borkar <[email protected] > > wrote: > > > > > Hi ant, > > > > > > > > > Here is the description of the license information for dblp.xml: > > > > > > http://dblp.uni-trier.de/xml/**README.txt< > http://dblp.uni-trier.de/xml/README.txt> > > > > > > The license governing it is > http://opendatacommons.org/**licenses/by/1.0/< > http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/> > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Vinayak > > > > > > > > > > > > On 10/2/13 4:21 AM, ant elder wrote: > > > > > >> This all looks ok to me. All I have is a question about the dblp.xml - > > >> where does that come from and whats its license? > > >> > > >> ...ant > > >> > > >> > > >> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 2:31 AM, Till Westmann <[email protected] > > wrote: > > >> > > >> Please verify and vote on the third release candidate for our first > > >>> release apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating. > > >>> > > >>> The tag to be voted on is > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/**asf/incubator/vxquery/tags/** > > >>> apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating/< > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/vxquery/tags/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating/ > > > > >>> > > >>> The artifacts, signatures, md5, and sha1 are at: > > >>> > > >>> https://repository.apache.org/**content/repositories/** > > >>> orgapachevxquery-109/org/**apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/** > > >>> 0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-**0.2-incubating-source-release.**zip< > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-109/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip > > > > >>> > > >>> https://repository.apache.org/**content/repositories/** > > >>> orgapachevxquery-109/org/**apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/** > > > >>> 0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-**0.2-incubating-source-release.**zip.asc< > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-109/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip.asc > > > > >>> > > >>> https://repository.apache.org/**content/repositories/** > > >>> orgapachevxquery-109/org/**apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/** > > > >>> 0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-**0.2-incubating-source-release.**zip.md5< > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-109/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip.md5 > > > > >>> > > >>> https://repository.apache.org/**content/repositories/** > > >>> orgapachevxquery-109/org/**apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/** > > > >>> 0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-**0.2-incubating-source-release.**zip.sha1< > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-109/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip.sha1 > > > > >>> > > >>> The RAT report is at: > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> http://people.apache.org/~**tillw/apache-vxquery-0.2-** > > >>> incubating/rat-report.txt< > http://people.apache.org/~tillw/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating/rat-report.txt > > > > >>> > > > >>> and the KEYS file containing the PGP keys used to sign the release can > > >>> currently be found at > > >>> > > >>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/**dist/release/incubator/**vxquery/KEYS< > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/vxquery/KEYS> > > >>> > > >>> The ASF's policy on release can be found here > > >>> > > >>> http://www.apache.org/dev/**release.html#approving-a-**release< > http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release> > > >>> > > >>> Please vote > > >>> [ ] +1 release this package as apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating > > >>> [ ] -1 do not release this package because ... > > >>> > > >>> Thanks, > > >>> Till > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > > >
