Yes, eth0 and eth1 should be on different subnets; if not, the router doesn't know which interface should be used to send traffic to another device on that subnet.
Best, Justin On Jan 30, 2008 7:47 AM, Daren Tay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi guys, > > I revisited the issue after getting a box to test > > I have set up a vyatta router with 4 ports > > eth0: 192.168.1.232 (WAN) -> simulate gateway#1 > eth1: 192.168.1.233 (WAN) -> simulate gateway#2 > eth2: 192.168.20.1 (LAN) -> simulate LAN #1, represented by a laptop > 192.168.20.2 :: to route through eth0 for gateway 192.168.1.1 > eth3: 192.168.30.1 (LAN) -> simulate LAN #2, represented by a laptop > 192.168.30.2 :: to route through eth1 for gateway 192.168.1.2 > > I can't get eth3 to work somehow.. I think the laptop needs to be connected > using a cross cable (using different laptops) > but .20.x side is working fine. As attached is the config. > > I then run the ip tool on 192.168.30.0.. > > but i still can't route out. > > when i set the gateway, it routes out, but via that gateway... > > both 192.168.1.1 abd 1.2 and adsl modems... or should I be ensuring both > eth0 and eth1 are of different subnet? > below is the config i did... > ======================================== > vyatta:~# ip route add default via 192.168.1.2 dev eth1 tab 2 > vyatta:~# ip rule add from 192.168.30.0/24 tab 2 priority 600 > vyatta:~# ip route list > 192.168.20.0/24 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.20.1 > 192.168.1.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.1.232 > 192.168.1.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.1.233 > 192.168.30.0/24 dev eth3 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.30.1 > vyatta:~# ip rule list > 0: from all lookup 255 > 600: from 192.168.30.0/24 lookup 2 > 32766: from all lookup main > 32767: from all lookup default > ========================================= > > > Food for thought? More testing to be done tomorrow! > > Thanks folks! > Daren > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Daren Tay > Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 11:50 AM > To: Robert Bays > > Cc: vyatta-users@mailman.vyatta.com > Subject: Re: [Vyatta-users] Managing different subnet with different > gateway > > > Ok roberts, will take note of that. > > My concern is just to ensure the 2 subnet have their traffic routed through > their respective gateways as different bandwidth is purchased for them :) > > Thanks man! > Daren > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Robert Bays > Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 2:59 AM > To: vyatta-users@mailman.vyatta.com > Subject: Re: [Vyatta-users] Managing different subnet with different > gateway > > > Daren, > > I would still setup a global default route in the router to handle > traffic not explicitly source routed. > > Cheers, > Robert. > > Daren Tay wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > > one more question: > > say I do the below mentioned way to have multi-gateway setup, but there'll > > still be a default gateway set in xorpsh yeah? > > Will this affect how traffic is routed out? > > > > Or should I just do away with the default gateway setup? > > > > Thanks! > > Daren > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Daren Tay > > Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2008 12:32 PM > > To: vyatta-users@mailman.vyatta.com > > Subject: Re: [Vyatta-users] Managing different subnet with different > > gateway > > > > > > Ah silly me, the obvious > > > > Thanks! > > Daren > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Robert Bays [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2008 7:00 AM > > To: Daren Tay > > Cc: vyatta-users@mailman.vyatta.com > > Subject: Re: [Vyatta-users] Managing different subnet with different > > gateway > > > > > > Running traceroute from a system on each subnet should show you > > different paths. > > > > cheers. > > > > Daren Tay wrote: > >> Cool guys :) > >> > >> I'm gonna give the ip rule a test when I head back to office on monday, > > but > >> how do I determine that it is working? > >> > >> Once that is done, I'll look into the bandwidth throttling. > >> > >> Daren > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Robert Bays [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2008 5:17 AM > >> To: Daren Tay > >> Cc: vyatta-users@mailman.vyatta.com > >> Subject: Re: [Vyatta-users] Managing different subnet with different > >> gateway > >> > >> > >> Daren, > >> > >> Yep. The tool is the standard linux ip command. The "ip rule from" > >> part tells the system that anything from this address should go to table > >> n. Each table has a separate default route. > >> > >> XORP *shouldn't* kill these routes since they aren't in the master > >> table. YMMV. As Aubrey correctly pointed out, you will want to add > >> these commands to your startup files so they are added at each boot. > >> > >> As for tracking bandwidth, you could also poll interface stats using > >> SNMP and rrdtool/mrtg. (ifOutOctets) > >> > >> Good Luck! > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Robert. > >> > >> > >> > >> Daren Tay wrote: > >>> Hi guys, > >>> > >>> yeah I want to route them out different gateway. > >>> > >>> what is this ip tool you are refering to? you mean the standard 'ip' > >> command > >>> over the linux kernel? > >>> And if I issue these command, won't xorp override it everytime i do a > >> commit > >>> within it? I thought Vyatta overrides any routing/settings the kernel > >> has.. > >>> so base on what you are advicing me, > >>>> #ip route add default via 10.0.0.1 dev eth0 tab 1 > >>>> #ip route add default via 10.1.0.1 dev eth1 tab 2 > >>>> #ip rule add from 192.168.16.0/24 tab 1 priority 500 > >>>> #ip rule add from 192.168.17.024 tab 2 priority 600 > >>> say my subnet 1 is 192.168.16.0/24 > >>> subnet 2 is 192.168.17.0/24 > >>> > >>> by add the above, i can define the default gateway out? > >>> > >>> And as my original question mention, will it interfere with Vyatta's > >>> settings (static routing etc), or vice versa? > >>> > >>> On a side note, am I able to track bandwidth usage on each of this > >>> interface? > >>> > >>> Thanks! > >>> Daren > >>> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: Aubrey Wells [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> Sent: Friday, January 04, 2008 6:19 AM > >>> To: Robert Bays > >>> Cc: Daren Tay; vyatta-users@mailman.vyatta.com > >>> Subject: Re: [Vyatta-users] Managing different subnet with different > >>> gateway > >>> > >>> > >>> hmmm I did not know you could do that with ip in linux. very > >>> interesting. you just solved a problem for me as well, thanks. :-) > >>> > >>> ------------------ > >>> Aubrey Wells > >>> Senior Engineer > >>> Shelton | Johns Technology Group > >>> A Vyatta Ready Partner > >>> www.sheltonjohns.com > >>> > >>> > >>> On Jan 3, 2008, at 1:14 PM, Robert Bays wrote: > >>> > >>>> Daren, > >>>> > >>>> If I am understanding you correctly you want to route the first local > >>>> interface out one gateway and the second local interface out the > >>>> second > >>>> gateway. You would need to use source based routing to do what you > >>>> are > >>>> looking for. That's not currently supported in the cli, but you can > >>>> do > >>>> it from the linux command prompt using the ip tool. Something like > >>>> this > >>>> should work for you. > >>>> > >>>> #ip route add default via 10.0.0.1 dev eth0 tab 1 > >>>> #ip route add default via 10.1.0.1 dev eth1 tab 2 > >>>> #ip rule add from 192.168.16.0/24 tab 1 priority 500 > >>>> #ip rule add from 192.168.17.024 tab 2 priority 600 > >>>> > >>>> Cheers, > >>>> Robert. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Daren Tay wrote: > >>>>> Hi there, > >>>>> > >>>>> my intention is just to use one router to handle 2 subnet. > >>>>> But each subnet has their own gateway, so how do I specify the > >>>>> different > >>>>> gateway on the router? > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks! > >>>>> Daren > >>>>> > >>>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>>> *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > >>>>> *Nick Davey > >>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, January 03, 2008 11:25 PM > >>>>> *To:* Daren Tay > >>>>> *Cc:* vyatta-users@mailman.vyatta.com > >>>>> *Subject:* Re: [Vyatta-users] Managing different subnet with > >>>>> different gateway > >>>>> > >>>>> I don't know if I'm understanding this right. You want to add a > >>>>> second subnet on a second interface of the Vyatta router? In that > >>>>> case, yes it will work fine, without much extra configuration (you > >>>>> may need to modify your NAT/firewall rules). That's a pretty > >>>>> straight forward setup though. If you are looking to add a second > >>>>> router to your network, with a second network behind that router > >>>>> you > >>>>> would need to add static routes for the network behind the second > >>>>> router, and a default route on the second router. Alternatively > >>>>> you > >>>>> could use a simple routing protocol like RIP. Make sense? > >>>>> > >>>>> On Jan 3, 2008 3:13 AM, Daren Tay <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Hi guys, > >>>>> > >>>>> happy 2008 wherever you guys are! > >>>>> > >>>>> I have a question: > >>>>> Currently my vyatta router is handling one subnet with one > >>>>> gateway, using > >>>>> NAT for the servers. > >>>>> SO basically its just static routing. > >>>>> > >>>>> I now need to add another subnet (different project) into the > >>>>> picture, which > >>>>> has its own gateway. > >>>>> Can the vyatta router handle 2 different subnet, each with its > >>>>> own gateway? > >>>>> > >>>>> Do advice ;) > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks! > >>>>> Daren > >>>>> > >>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>> Vyatta-users mailing list > >>>>> Vyatta-users@mailman.vyatta.com > >>>>> <mailto:Vyatta-users@mailman.vyatta.com> > >>>>> http://mailman.vyatta.com/mailman/listinfo/vyatta-users > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > - > > - > >>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>> Vyatta-users mailing list > >>>>> Vyatta-users@mailman.vyatta.com > >>>>> http://mailman.vyatta.com/mailman/listinfo/vyatta-users > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> Vyatta-users mailing list > >>>> Vyatta-users@mailman.vyatta.com > >>>> http://mailman.vyatta.com/mailman/listinfo/vyatta-users > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Vyatta-users mailing list > >>> Vyatta-users@mailman.vyatta.com > >>> http://mailman.vyatta.com/mailman/listinfo/vyatta-users > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Vyatta-users mailing list > >> Vyatta-users@mailman.vyatta.com > >> http://mailman.vyatta.com/mailman/listinfo/vyatta-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Vyatta-users mailing list > > Vyatta-users@mailman.vyatta.com > > http://mailman.vyatta.com/mailman/listinfo/vyatta-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Vyatta-users mailing list > > Vyatta-users@mailman.vyatta.com > > http://mailman.vyatta.com/mailman/listinfo/vyatta-users > _______________________________________________ > Vyatta-users mailing list > Vyatta-users@mailman.vyatta.com > http://mailman.vyatta.com/mailman/listinfo/vyatta-users > > _______________________________________________ > Vyatta-users mailing list > Vyatta-users@mailman.vyatta.com > http://mailman.vyatta.com/mailman/listinfo/vyatta-users > > _______________________________________________ > Vyatta-users mailing list > Vyatta-users@mailman.vyatta.com > http://mailman.vyatta.com/mailman/listinfo/vyatta-users > > _______________________________________________ Vyatta-users mailing list Vyatta-users@mailman.vyatta.com http://mailman.vyatta.com/mailman/listinfo/vyatta-users
