On 1/21/2016 10:57 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 02:13:45PM +0600, Daniil Baturin wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
That's a valid concern indeed, and this decision does feel bad.
However, between leaving people with 1.1.6 and these possible problems
and without the fixes and additions from lithium, and leaving them with
lithium and the same problem, the latter probably looks better.
+1
Let's ship Lithium (1.2) asap.
At least it will give us motivation to work on jessie port faster. ;)
Possible options for security updates include pulling patches from
CentOS, as RHEL people keep backporing stuff for a long while, and our
packages are not much older than those of EL6. Still can be a
maintenance nightmare, but at least should be possible.
Sadly at the moment we have to choose between bad options as we don't
have a good one yet.
Yep. Let's focus on porting to Jessie after Lithium is out.
-- Pasi
+1 - agree on all points here as well.
I took a look at bugzilla but did not see much relating to lithium
release, do we have a list of blocking issues? If there are more than a
few perhaps we should create a meta-bug to track what's left.
--
Seamus Caveney
Senior Network Administrator
Active Solutions Group
4 Park Lane Blvd Ste 170 – Dearborn, MI 48126
phone: 313.278.4522 x 102
_______________________________________________
Vyos-developers mailing list
Vyos-developers@lists.tuxis.nl
https://lists.tuxis.nl/listinfo/vyos-developers
