On 02/08/2011 12:04 PM, NetSam-trklisted wrote: > I have seen nothing but issues with SF.net lately. If you look at some of the > underground zines you have seen SF.net getting attacked often last year with > some scary results. I second recommending an alternative sourcecode hosting > scenario.
Git gives every dev a cryptographically signed, full backup of all data that cannot be modified without others noticing. Source code protection is built in to git. It's one of the main reasons I'm so bullish on git. There's also tons of other benefits I've already enumerated. All end user releases should be GPG signed. All hosts can be and will be compromised. w3af (and all projects) need to not be dependant on the security of their hosts. -- | Steven Pinkham, Security Consultant | | http://www.mavensecurity.com | | GPG public key ID CD31CAFB |
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb
_______________________________________________ W3af-develop mailing list W3af-develop@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/w3af-develop
