Javier, On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 7:45 PM, Javier Andalia <janda...@gmail.com> wrote: > Andres, > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 6:48 PM, Andres Riancho > <andres.rian...@gmail.com> wrote: >> List, >> >> We had some issue that raised a "TypeError: >> Gtk.MozEmbed.render_data() argument 3 must be string, not url_object", >> I fixed in a while ago in revision "4300", and now it's appearing > > r4300 is the right number?
No, that's why I put it between quotes :) Didn't thought that the exact revision mattered >> again [0]. The strange thing is that the bug report says that they are >> using the latest revision, which should have the bug already fixed; >> AND in the traceback it shows the OLD version of that line of code >> [1]. So... how can this w3af install be in revision 4346 but have that >> old piece of code? >> >> @Javier: You worked on the auto-update, any hints? > > The only thing I can think of right now is that an error actually > occurred when updating the code and yet w3af could be restarted (after > displaying the user an error message). I've just checked the routine > that reads from the svn file the current revision [0] and it takes as > reference *only* the svn "entries" file in the project root. Also, > this is possible with SVN: > > $:~/workspace/w3af$ svn info > [...] > Revision: 4331 > [...] > > $:~/workspace/w3af$ cd plugins > $:~/workspace/w3af/plugins$ svn info > [...] > Revision: 4347 > [...] > > Meaning that different directories in the project can be updated to > different revisions. > > So it seems that the get-revision routine doesn't warranty that the > whole code is updated to the reported version. Is there a better way of doing that with python's svn wrapper? > Javier > > [0] > https://w3af.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/w3af/trunk/core/controllers/misc/get_w3af_version.py > -- Andrés Riancho Director of Web Security at Rapid7 LLC Founder at Bonsai Information Security Project Leader at w3af ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 _______________________________________________ W3af-develop mailing list W3af-develop@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/w3af-develop
