Hi all,

I fully agree with Taras.

Question before I dig deeper:
        does w3af currently identify (correctly) which parts of the URL
        are the INFO_PATH (actually tartofdefence.com h/bar/123 part, see 
below)?

Achim


Am 15.11.2011 14:25, schrieb Taras:
> Hi, all!
> 
> Andres, when I have suggested this feature in w3af I didn't mean *full* 
> REST specification support.
> 
> Today a lot of web applications (especially based on frameworks like 
> Django or in the old way by Apache mod_rewrite module) uses REST-like 
> URLs e.g.:
> 
>    http://example.com/foo/bar/123
> 
> In this URL we (not scanner) can see such parts as:
> 
> * foo - controller name
> * bar - action name
> * 123 - parameter value
> 
>  From classic web spider point of view it looks like directory hierarchy 
> - it is incorrect behavior! All these parts we need to fuzz!
> 
> What I suggest to implement is rules for such URLs. It can be done as 
> http-settings
> file option called "url-rules" (name is not important):
> 
>      /top/users/%s/view/%d/
>      /controller/action/%d/
>      ...
> 
> %s and %d are special tokens which can be used by w3af to determine fuzz 
> points.
> 
> 
>>      This email is just a conversation starter for defining how we're
>> going to deal with REST urls.
>>
>>      REST, as described in [0], has two important moving parts:
>>          1- URLs that "look nice" (no parameters: /people/1/phones/23 )
>>          2- Heavy usage of HTTP methods like GET, POST, DELETE, PUT.
>>
>>      The first question that I would ask myself is... do we want to
>> support 1 and 2? Only 1? What is really needed by our users?
>>
>>      If we only want to implement #1, it should be easy enough, since
>> we already have something similar (see: mutantFileName.py). This
>> mutant, together with the fuzzer.py (more specifically
>> _createFileNameMutants) will behave like this:
>>
>>      - Original URL: http://host.tld/foo/spam-eggs.jsp
>>      - Input strings: [ '<script>alert(1)</script>', 'ping localhost']
>>      - Output URLs:
>>          * http://host.tld/foo/<script>alert(1)</script>-eggs.jsp
>>          * http://host.tld/foo/spam-<script>alert(1)</script>.jsp
>>          * http://host.tld/foo/ping%20localhost-eggs.jsp
>>          * http://host.tld/foo/spam-ping%20localhost.jsp
>>
>>      As you can see, it will split the filename using any character
>> that's not a letter and put the strings into those positions. If we
>> change this from just the filename into the whole path, it should work
>> and inject into each URL section.
>>
>>      Please note that the current implementation only performs file
>> name fuzzing if misc-settings fuzzFileName is enabled (which is off by
>> default). Should we also think about this and potentially modify this
>> to true?
>>
>>      Regarding #2 , I don't see a reason for it not to work with
>> w3af... but I could be mistaken. We should perform some tests to check
>> if w3af parses and correctly sends requests associated with forms that
>> use PUT, DELETE, etc. The meta-question here is... do we want w3af to
>> send requests that will "DELETE" stuff?
>>
>>      Ok... that's enough for a conversation starter :) What do you guys 
>> think?
>>
>> [0] http://microformats.org/wiki/rest/urls
>>
>> Regards,
> 
> 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
_______________________________________________
W3af-develop mailing list
W3af-develop@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/w3af-develop

Reply via email to