Andres, > Not 100% a workaround, this is also a best practice! > > https://devcenter.heroku.com/articles/python-pip#the-basics
Could you please show at least one example of well-know software with such requirements? By the way in w3af dev list I see fresh discussion about similar problems in Mageia Linux distro http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=31315478 >> 1. Bring back dependency check with >= condition > > Disagree with this, it will bring issues in the future, and it not a > best practice. > >> 2. We should separate core and plugins requirements >> 3. We should make possible to run w3af without installation of all plugins >> dependencies. It can be with special argument to w3af_console called "-l or >> --lazy". This parameter will force w3af not to check plugins dependencies >> (or even switch off dependency checker all!). > > You can disable checks for the dependencies which are used in plugins, > not for the ones in the core or stuff will break in the middle of the > scan. If default behavior will not be changed why you are still against disabling it at all by special parameter? This parameter will be used only by package maintainers who specifies these dependencies in the package and geeks who don't want to install stuff they don't really need. -- Taras https://www.oxdef.info ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Android apps run on BlackBerry 10 Introducing the new BlackBerry 10.2.1 Runtime for Android apps. Now with support for Jelly Bean, Bluetooth, Mapview and more. Get your Android app in front of a whole new audience. Start now. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=124407151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ W3af-develop mailing list W3af-develop@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/w3af-develop
