hi all,
another good paper comparing scanners is here:
http://www.cs.ucsb.edu/~adoupe/static/black-box-scanners-dimva2010.pdf
i think there are even some "limitations" mentioned in there, that could be
seen as bugs ;-)
it's well worth reading.
cheers,
tom
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 8:26 PM, Andres Riancho <[email protected]>wrote:
> Guys,
>
> This is a comparison made by the UCSB where w3af is mentioned.
>
> [0]
> http://www.cs.ucsb.edu/~chris/research/doc/raid08_xss.pdf<http://www.cs.ucsb.edu/%7Echris/research/doc/raid08_xss.pdf>
>
> Regards,
> --
> Andrés Riancho
> Founder, Bonsai - Information Security
> http://www.bonsai-sec.com/
> http://w3af.sf.net/
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Sell apps to millions through the Intel(R) Atom(Tm) Developer Program
> Be part of this innovative community and reach millions of netbook users
> worldwide. Take advantage of special opportunities to increase revenue and
> speed time-to-market. Join now, and jumpstart your future.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-atom-d2d
> _______________________________________________
> W3af-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/w3af-users
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sell apps to millions through the Intel(R) Atom(Tm) Developer Program
Be part of this innovative community and reach millions of netbook users
worldwide. Take advantage of special opportunities to increase revenue and
speed time-to-market. Join now, and jumpstart your future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-atom-d2d
_______________________________________________
W3af-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/w3af-users
