Dear Andrés,

Please not that I have installed W3af on two different operating systems.

W3af version 1.0 on Linux, Ubuntu distribution

W3af, version 1.1, on Window 7.

Sincerely

James




________________________________
 From: Andres Riancho <[email protected]>
To: "You Know My Name, My name is Bond, James Bond" <[email protected]> 
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> 
Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2012 6:15 AM
Subject: Re: [W3af-users] W3af stoops after scanning 21.60% or crashes
 
Sorry but I didn't read your email just the subject, which w3af
version are you using? Which OS?

On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 10:02 PM, You Know My Name, My name is Bond,
James Bond <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dear Andrés,
>
> I am writing this email to you requesting your assistant in helping me in
> troubleshooting problems with W3af. Your kindness and response to my email
> will be immensely appreciated.
>
> I have been using W3af for the past two weeks very extensively. I am very
> excited about the program and I can see how the program can stand up to its
> promises. But, unfortunately, I have not been able to complete even a single
> operation with the W3af due to crashing and or to program suspending
> operation.
>
> Initially I have used W3af on Linux, Ubuntu distribution, which I have
> downloaded directly from the Ubuntu package archives. Unfortunately, the
> program kept on crashing shortly after starting. I was thinking that perhaps
> I have misused or misconfigured the W3af, which now I do not believe is the
> case. I have read the w3af User Guide, Document version: 2.0 many times and
> watched videos on YouTube and on W3af website.
>
> Just before giving up on the program I decided to install W3af on Window 7.
> The program runs without crashing, but it seems to stop all the time when
> reaching 21.60%. I have left the program running for 3 days assuming that
> the warning, which is clearly stating in the w3af User Guide -- it is going
> to take long time and perhaps days -- might be relevant to my case.
>
> On a positive note, W3af managed to discover with only 21.60% numerous "MD5"
> hash and to detect other vulnerabilities. However, by conducting several
> deferent scans I have gotten different results.  In a way of example W3af
> found deferent number of hashs on the same website.
>
> I could not manage to decode any of the MD5s using the tools provided in
> W3af. Those Hashs are:
>
>     D41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e
>
>     6fa5720fad59de166d01936dc0982d61
>
>     faa166cdbdb7d5ea61dae46bbf4db088"
>
> SHA1 da39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709
>
> aptchaKey=1ae0fcc6e08bb30eeeed7bb7fc00da80
>
> I am taking this opportunity and thanking you in advance for taking your
> time to read this email and eagerly waiting for your prompt reply.
> Sincerely
>
> James
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
> Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You.
> Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2
> _______________________________________________
> W3af-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/w3af-users
>



-- 
Andrés Riancho
Project Leader at w3af - http://w3af.org/
Web Application Attack and Audit Framework
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You.
Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2
_______________________________________________
W3af-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/w3af-users

Reply via email to