C11 does not specify a static initializer, based on the idea that the a mutex will be platform and/or implementation dependent. As such the alternative solution is to initialize the mutex with call_once/mtx_init. This will allow us to remove the transition hack, and in due time move to the system's C11 threads implementation.
v2: Actually use call_once() to prevent the possibility of multiple threads hitting the mtx_init() at the same time. Suggested by Jose. v3: Do not destroy the mutex. Suggested by Chad. Cc: Jose Fonseca <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <[email protected]> --- src/waffle/core/wcore_display.c | 11 ++++++++++- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/waffle/core/wcore_display.c b/src/waffle/core/wcore_display.c index 2feeeba..40f98cf 100644 --- a/src/waffle/core/wcore_display.c +++ b/src/waffle/core/wcore_display.c @@ -29,16 +29,25 @@ #include "wcore_display.h" +static mtx_t mutex; + +static void +wcore_display_init_once(void) +{ + mtx_init(&mutex, mtx_plain); +} + bool wcore_display_init(struct wcore_display *self, struct wcore_platform *platform) { static size_t id_counter = 0; - static mtx_t mutex = _MTX_INITIALIZER_NP; + static once_flag flag = ONCE_FLAG_INIT; assert(self); assert(platform); + call_once(&flag, wcore_display_init_once); mtx_lock(&mutex); self->api.display_id = ++id_counter; mtx_unlock(&mutex); -- 2.3.1 _______________________________________________ waffle mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/waffle
