Thumbs up on Aquel and Top Ride.  Aquel is the best gel floatant out there,
in my opinion.  It stays consistent; it doesn't coagulate in cooler weather,
and doesn't turn to water when temperature gets above 80.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kent Lufkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:02 PM
Subject: Re: WaterShed on Nymphs?


> Why do you want to make a weighted nymph float? Seems counterproductive.
>
> There was a new floatant out a year or two ago called Frog Fanny. The
> manufacturer claimed it'd even make a bead-head nymph float. It's a
> fluffy powder you apply with a little brush in the cap and traps
> little air bubbles in the hackle and body.
>
> Worked just like WaterShed - dry flies would float until you caught a
> fish with 'em, then it was back to square one. Never tried it with a
> nymph though, so I couldn't say if it worked or not.
>
> I've been using Loon's Aquel lately. Once my dry fly becomes
> waterlogged, I'll shake it off then use a small piece of chamois to
> blot it dry. Sometimes, instead of reapplying more Aquel, I'll shake
> the blotted fly in Loon Top Ride or Shimazake Dry Shake before
> fishing it again.
>
> Kent Lufkin
>
> >Hello fellow fly fishers,
> >
> >For several years now, I have been using WaterShed "permanent
waterproofing
> >liquid" for all my dry flies. It is applied at least 24 hours before
> >fishing. It's supposed to be permanent, but I find I must still
recondition
> >the fly after hooking a fish. So in my opinion, it doesn't live up to its
> >billing, but does work well on the fly until then.
> >
> >But my real question to the list is this:  have any of you used WaterShed
> >on weighted nymphs?
> >
> >I've read where this will trap gas bubbles in the dubbing of the nymphs
and
> >give them an appetizing look. I've tied up a bunch of my favorite
beadhead
> >nymphs (zugbugs and black hare's ears, etc.) and given them the WaterShed
> >treatment. It's always fun to experiment, eh?
> >
> >Anyone tried this?
> >
> >Fish on, my friend.
> >Danny McMillin
>
>

Reply via email to