I agree about the reduction in force. The final statement in the article sums up how I feel about the situation:
"Our enthusiasm for technology can't be disconnected from the need for trained officers in the field." I'm kind of disappointed that no fishing violations were mentioned in the article. Do you suppose that the author of the article did not cite any fishing examples because a story of someone poaching a fish does not have the same impact as a story about a guy who took a moose illegally? Brent --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Nice to see some of the bad guys getting caught by > the use of cell phones. I'm bothered, however about > the reduction in force of WDFW agents in the field. > Thanks for posting the article. > > > > There is an interesting article in the Thursday > > edition of the Seattle Times about the use of the > new > > technology in the fight against poachers. > > > > "Investigators discover friend in cell phones" > > > > > http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/fishing/2002114556_webpoachers09.html > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________ > > Do you Yahoo!? > > Send holiday email and support a worthy cause. Do > good. > > http://celebrity.mail.yahoo.com > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Dress up your holiday email, Hollywood style. Learn more. http://celebrity.mail.yahoo.com
