I say with Wagon 2.0, we don't even bother with maintaining backwards compatibility.
(Yes, I like the idea of calling it Wagon 2.0) We should also get Milos Kleint and Eugene Kuleshov involved to see if there is anything that he would like to have from their IDE integration points of view. - Joakim John Casey wrote: > Hi, > > I just committed some changes to trunk that should restore backward > compatibility for using older wagons (at least in the vast majority of > cases). It may still break if there is an older version of a wagon out > there > that doesn't extend from AbstractWagon (since the Wagon interface > picked up > like 5 new methods lately). > > Can we start talking about a Wagon 1.0-final release? What do we need > to get > this done? It looks like the current roadmap only shows 3 outstanding > issues > for the next release. Does anyone have plans for finishing those, and are > they enough to serve as a basis for a final release? > > I'm just trying to figure out what plans there are for this, since I'd > like > to move toward a 2.1-alpha-1 release of maven, and this is going to be a > prereq. > > Thanks, > > John > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
