In general, I certainly agree. However, there are issues open for 1.0
that include documentation which would make it usable by someone else.
Also, I'm hesitant to jump to 1.0 after incorporating 59 fixes
spanning more than a year.
IMO, these shouldn't halt another release though.
*Please* change the subject when you comment on a vote so that it
doesn't confuse things, such as with James' reply.
- Brett
On 05/06/2008, at 7:24 AM, Joakim Erdfelt wrote:
Ugh. beta-3?
Can't we just call this 1.0 yet?
- Joakim
Brett Porter wrote:
Hi
The Wagon 1.0-beta-3 candidate has been staged.
This release includes 59 fixes. You can take a look at the release
notes here:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10335&styleName=Html&version=12544
While the binaries, including the sources, signatures and
checksums, can be downloaded here:
http://people.apache.org/~brett/staged-releases-wagon
The tag is:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/wagon/tags/wagon-1.0-beta-3
Everyone is encouraged to vote and give their feedback.
[ ] +1 Release it!
[ ] 0
[ ] -1 Don't release it, because...
The vote will be open for 72 hours.
Thanks,
Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
