On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 10:00 AM, Christophe Pettus <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sep 15, 2014, at 3:37 PM, Daniel Farina <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The thing that is most worrisome about this is how to deal with >> breaking storage compatibility. It's probably not insurmountable but >> it's a bit of a thing. > > My thought was something like --history-prefix=..., which the default being > the same path as the rest of the files. Thus, existing installations don't > have to change anything.
I am not inclined to add any options to tweak the storage layout. I'd rather have a fallback for backwards compatibility and otherwise have new installations to write things in the new format. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "wal-e" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
