On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 4:29 AM <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> Am Mittwoch, 8. Juni 2016 09:32:37 UTC+2 schrieb [email protected]:
>>
>>
>>
>> Am Dienstag, 7. Juni 2016 20:42:05 UTC+2 schrieb Daniel Farina:
>>>
>>>
>>> What version of WAL-E and boto? Newer versions of wal-e all use SigV4
>>> and that has been working well and confirmed working in eu-central-1.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Dear Daniel
>>
>> Thank you very much for your reply. I am using WAL-E version 0.9.2  and
>> boto version 2.39.0. I am also using an S3 compatible storage rather than
>> Amazon S3, though the configuration is the same and I can access the
>> storage with my credentials through other means (e.g S3 Browser,
>> duplicity), just not with WAL-E.
>>
>
>  Something else I found: The storage we have uses the signature algorithm
> HMAC-SHA1 V2, whereas SigV4 uses HMAC-SHA256 as far as I understand, which
> would explain the error. Can you confirm this and if so, what would be the
> best workaround?
>

So you are using WALE_S3_ENDPOINT?  I'm reasonably sure that I turned off
Sigv4 when this was in use, attempting to avoid this outcome, so the
problem could be something else.  Perhaps confirm that WAL-E is attempting
to use SigV4?

You may have to enable debug output in boto to see what's going on, or
instrument the code.

What S3-compatible software are you using? I don't know much about any of
them in particular, but I'd like to know to get a sense of what people are
doing with WAL-E.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"wal-e" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to