Hi Mart,i Dont think this is the motherload virus the Apple community has been dreading, i think its alot of the same hype we have seen before with opener et al, as i have stated previously, it requires alot of user interaction for a *virus* and i hesitate to call it that., by and large i would expect that Apple will patch this thing pretty quickly:
as for antivius software: i like Clam AV, run it on 5 of my Servers here at Elproducto, it has a low overhead and is patched and updated regularly, i have also run it on Machines when i was at ECU, all in all i'm not convinced the CME-4, OSX/Leap trojan/worm/virus thing is anything new or anything to be overly concerned about, i would be more concerned that other malicious code writers will see all the hype and media about this thing and start to work out ways to exploit OS X, and during that process somebody will actually write something that is very dangerous and does serious damage to an OS X system.
from the ambrosia site: You cannot be infected by this unless you do all of the following:1) Are somehow sent (via email, iChat, etc.) or download the "latestpics.tgz" file
2) Double-click on the file to decompress it 3) Double-click on the resulting file to "open" it ...and then for non-Admin users, it fails to infect most applications.You cannot simply "catch" the virus. Even if someone does send you the "latestpics.tgz" file, you cannot be infected unless you unarchive the file, and then open it.
A few important points-- This should probably be classified as a Trojan, not a virus, because it doesn't self-propagate externally (though it could arguably be called a very non-virulent virus)
-- It does not exploit any security holes; rather it uses "social engineering" to get the user to launch it on their system
-- If you're not running as an admin user, it will silently fail to infect most applications
-- It doesn't actually do anything other than attempt to propagate itself via iChat, and then only via Bonjour! (it does not sent itself over the Internet, rather just to your local Bonjour user list)
-- It has a bug in the code that prevents it from working as intended, which has the side-effect of preventing infected applications from launching
-- It's not particularly sophisticated cheers Nat On Feb 17, 2006, at 3:31 PM, Martin Hill wrote:
Nat, as I mentioned, I agree with some of your points (though we might agree to disagree on the corruption vs destruction point!), but I think the mainpoint is that here is the first evidence of Mac OS X malware that: - does NOT in most cases need a password to run, - that infects (and then because of a bug corrupts) other applications - that attempts to self-replicate using Apple-specific IM software (thevirus author also apparently planned to implement eMail propagation as well,"but never got around to writing that code")and thus displays some of the features of a virus and a worm as well as atrojan horse.Whether it is terribly effective or not I think the fact remains that this represents a significant new development in the small world of malware for OS X. We are now not talking about a simple trojan which lacks an automatedinfection vector.As such, I have finally decided to install Nortons AV on my Mac (it's site licensed software here at Curtin) and realise that although the chances of being infected by OS X malware is very low, the chances are now not zero(particularly if you use iChat at the moment).More to the point, proof-of-concept code such as this can be modified tocarry a much nastier payload down the road, so I think we need to be alittle more cautious now as Mac users - though of course we needn't be asparanoid as PC users need to be.Unfortunately we can't now brag that OS X has Zero Viruses/worms because it is not really true anymore (semantic arguments notwithstanding!). However we *can* brag about the 140,000 to 1 ratio of such malware when comparing Windows to OS X and the fact that there are still zero recorded instances of spyware and adware which all still adds up to a huge selling point for theMac. -MartFrom: subscribe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:22:51 +0800 To: WAMUG Mailing List <[email protected]> Subject: Re: First self-propagating worm targeting Mac OS X Mart the only self mounting compressed files are SEA from OS9 and .dmg OS Xthis only affects PPC running 10.4, it does not effect 10.3 or Core Duobased machinesand it self propagates to other users in the iChat buddy list *if* itsshell script is executed it does not destroy or modify anything, nor does it delete anything, degrade performance, cause system instability or compromise any security settings so no i would not agree that corrupting any application you run is destructive when you crash an application on OS X, is that destructive??? thats corruption, its different cheers Nat On Feb 17, 2006, at 1:11 PM, Martin Hill wrote:From: Martin Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>(2) unpack the tar.gz (3) run the shell script that is insideI understand these steps all happen automatically without requiring human intervention. I don't think it negates the self-replicating dangers of the beast.Actually, thinking more about this (not being an iChat user much myself), you probably are correct on this count, the user would have to double-click the compressed file and then open the terminal script file manually with current versions of Mac OS X. I would hope Auto-decompress and auto-open shouldn't be enabled with iChat and the de-compression engine these days! As such you would hope this would give many users a warning that this is no ordinary file, but no password will be required normally and the self-replication vector is still there so I think this is still a serious issue.(4) type in an administrator password when the shell script asks forit.It also does NOT require a password if your account has admin privileges (root privileges NOT required). Most Mac users I know are running with admin privileges enabled (the default option when OS X is installed) so they won't have the warning of having to type in a pwd.hardly a virus ,As various commentators have indicated, it is really a blended threat:"Leap.A (CME-4) acts like a combination of a Trojan, virus and worm. It acts like a Trojan because it masquerades as a JPEG file, a virus because itattempts to infect executables, and a worm because it attempts to sendcopies of itself to others via iCHAT. This last action is similar to that of an instant messaging worm on the Windows platform." I wouldn't brush it off quite so quickly, particularly as it now provides a platform for more nasties to use as a base to do worse things.Malware..?, yes its malicious but not destructive,Corrupting any application you run is not destructive? It may not beas nasty as deleting your home directory, but it still qualifies as destructive in my book.it requires so much user interaction, it looks like more of a social engineering exercise or a proof of concept like opener was.The only user interaction it requires is to accept the download of the file in iChat from what I've read. If your trusted buddy on iChat sends you whatlooks like a jpeg file with the title "Mac OS X 10.5 screen shots" thechances are you will click accept. Yes? We're not talking email from some unknown source here.thoughts?I've been the first to set the record straight on false Mac virus scares in the past, but it doesn't mean we should necessarily take this one lightly. The stats still stand at the following: Microsoft Windows: Viruses and Worms = 140,000 (Symantec Security Focus) Spyware and Adware programs = 78,000 (www.pestpatrol.com) Burrowers = 40 (www.pestpatrol.com) 80% of PCs infected with spyware (webroot.com) 2004 alone: - 500 new Trojans (www.pestpatrol.com) - 500 new keyloggers (www.pestpatrol.com) - 1,287 new adware apps (www.pestpatrol.com) - 7,360 new viruses and worms (symantec.com) Mac OS X: Viruses and Worms = 1 Spyware programs = 0 Adware = 0 Keyloggers = 0 Burrowers = 0 Trojans = 3 (symantec.com) 2004: - 1 Rootkit (symantec.com)With many of the thousands of Windows viruses and worms being far morenasty compared to this fairly innocuous Mac worm, it is by no means the end of the world, but this is nonetheless the first truly credible self-propagating threat to OS X. I think we should finally start looking at firming up our malware strategies on the Mac just to be safe. -Martcheers Nat On Feb 17, 2006, at 9:18 AM, Martin Hill wrote:Well it has finally happened after all these years of commentators crying wolf.The first bit of malware that attempts to spread itself to other Macusers has finally arrived on the scene. Note this is not technically a virus asmany articles are saying but it is also not just a simple trojan assome Mac users are saying. To get infected a user has to click on what looks like a jpeg file in a message sent through Apple's iChat program so it requires user intervention, but as it then attempts to infect other applications - they get corrupted due to a bug. It then attempts to send copies of itself to all users in the buddy list of the infected user if they use the iChat software. This malware also does not require the affected user to enter a password if they are an admin user (or if they are a root user) - it only asks for a password if they have been intentionally set up as a user without admin privileges. As a default install of OS X automatically gives the main user admin privs, most users will not be asked for a password as this worm installs itself. Although it does not delete files or do any other nasty things, it looks like other nasty hackers could modify this initial code to cause more damage. Looks like we had all finally better start installing and using anti-virus software on our Macs (particularly if you use (Apple's iChat software). Symantec's Description of this worm (which they call "OSX.Leap.A" also known as the "Oompa Loompa" worm): http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/ osx.leap.a.html The stats still stand at the following: Windows Viruses/worms = 140,000 Mac OS X worms = 1With many of the thousands of Windows viruses and worms particularlynasty compared to this fairly innocuous Mac worm, it is by no means the end of the world, but this is nonetheless the first truly credible threat to OS X. Here are the details from MacFixit: http://www.macfixit.com/article.php?story=20060216075452766 "Protective method: Setting iChat to not automatically accept incoming files In order to protect against the unintended acquisition of this malware, it is recommended that you set iChat to notify the user before accepting a file. This is accomplished by opening iChat's preferences, then clicking the "Messages" tab, and selecting "Confirm before sending files." This is the default setting for a fresh Mac OS X installation. And remember, be very cautious with supplying your administrator password to system prompts. You should never be asked to enter your administrator password to open a .jpg file (as in the above case). Provide your administrator password only to trusted applications. In fact, you should avoid being logged in as an administrator whenever possible. Instead, use a standard user account for daily tasks.Andrew Welch of Ambrosia Software has discovered and described a newpiece of malware for Mac OS X dubbed the "Oompa-Loompa Trojan (OSX/Oomp-A)"The malware was posted as "latestpics.tgz" to a Mac rumors web site,claiming to be pictures of "Mac OS X Leopard" (an upcoming version of Mac OS X. Andrew writes: "When unarchived (it is a gzip-compressed tar file), which can be done by simply double-clicking on the file, it appears to be a JPEG file because someone pasted the image of a JPEG file onto the file."After it's been unzipped, tar will tell you there are two files inthe archive: * ._latestpics * latestpics "The ._latestpics is just the resource fork of the file, which contains the pasted in custom icon meant to fool people into double-clicking on it to (in theory) open the JPEG file for viewing. In actuality, double-clicking on it will launch an executable file. "The file 'latestpics' is actually a PowerPC-compiled executable program, with routines such as: * _infect: * _infectApps: * _installHooks: * _copySelf: "A few important points * This should probably be classified as a Trojan, not a virus, because it doesn't self-propagate externally* It does not exploit any security holes; rather it uses "socialengineering" to get the user to launch it on their system * It requires the admin password if you're not running as an admin user * It doesn't actually do anything other than attempt to propagate itself via iChat * It has a bug in the code that prevents it from working as intended, and has the side-effect of preventing infected applications from launching * It's not particularly sophisticated "Here's what it does if a user double-clicks on the file, or otherwise executes it: 1. It copies itself to /tmp as "latestpics" 2. It recreates its resource fork in /tmp (with the custom icon in it)from an internally stored gzip'd copy, then sets custom icon bit forthe new file in /tmp 3. It then tar + gzips itself so a pristine copy of itself in .tgz format is left in /tmp4. It renames itself from "latestpics.tar.gz" to "latestpics.tgz"thendeletes the copied "latestpics" executable from /tmp (This gives ita pristine copy of itself, for later transmission) 5. It extracts an Input Manager called "apphook.bundle" that is embedded in the macho executable, and copies it to /tmp 6. If your uid = 0 (you're root), it creates /Library/InputManagers/ , deletes any existing "apphook" bundle in that folder, and copies "apphook" from /tmp to that folder; If your uid != 0 (you're not root), it creates~/Library/InputManagers/ , deletes any existing "apphook" bundle inthat folder, and copies "apphook" from /tmp to that folder 7. When any application is launched, Mac OS X loads the newly installed "apphook" Input Manager automatically into its address space (This allows it to have the code in the "apphook.bundle" injected into any subsequently launched application via the InputManager mechanism) 8. When an application is subsequently launched, the "apphook.bundle" Input Manager then appears to try to send the pristine "latestpics.tgz" file in /tmp to people on your buddy list via iChat (who will then presumably download the file, double-click on it, and the cycle repeats) (It looks likethe author intended to get it to send the "latestpics.tgz" file outvia eMail as well, but never got around to writing that code) -- This lets itsend itself to people on your buddy list via iChat; this appears tobe the only way it self-propagates externally 9. It then uses Spotlight to find the 4 most recently used applications on your machine that are not owned by root10. In an apparent "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory" reference,it thenchecks to see if the xattr 'oompa' of the application executable is0... if so, it bails out, to prevent it from re-infecting an already infected application 11. If not, it sets the xattr 'oompa' of the application executable to be 'loompa' (this does nothing, it is just a marker that it has infected this app)12. It then copies the application executable to its own resourcefork, and replaces the executable with itself -- It has thus effectively injected its code in the host application13. When an application is launched from then on, the trojan codeisexecuted, and it tries to re-infect and re-propagate every time thatapplication is launched14. It then does an execv on the resource fork of the executable,which isthe original application, so the application launches as it normallywould (in theory... see below) [...] "In the end, it doesn't appear to actually do anything other than try to propagate itself via iChat, and unintentionally prevent infected applications from running "It seems that this is more of a 'proof of concept' implementation thatcould be utilized to actually do something in the future, dependingon how successful it is, or it was simply done to garner attention/press. Which I'm sure it'll get. As noted by Andrew, this particular piece of malware requires user-initiatedaction to run, and also requires the user to enter an administratorpassword(if you are logged in as a non-admin user) -- something that shouldnever be required for opening a .jpg file. Its effects also seem to be innocuous." -Mart -- The WA Macintosh User Group Mailing List -- Archives - <http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/archives.shtml>Guidelines - <http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/guidelines.shtml>Unsubscribe - <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> WAMUG is powered by Stalker CommuniGatePro-- The WA Macintosh User Group Mailing List -- Archives - <http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/archives.shtml> Guidelines - <http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/guidelines.shtml> Unsubscribe - <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> WAMUG is powered by Stalker CommuniGatePro-- The WA Macintosh User Group Mailing List -- Archives - <http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/archives.shtml> Guidelines - <http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/guidelines.shtml> Unsubscribe - <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> WAMUG is powered by Stalker CommuniGatePro-- The WA Macintosh User Group Mailing List -- Archives - <http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/archives.shtml> Guidelines - <http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/guidelines.shtml> Unsubscribe - <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> WAMUG is powered by Stalker CommuniGatePro-- The WA Macintosh User Group Mailing List -- Archives - <http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/archives.shtml> Guidelines - <http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/guidelines.shtml> Unsubscribe - <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> WAMUG is powered by Stalker CommuniGatePro-- The WA Macintosh User Group Mailing List -- Archives - <http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/archives.shtml> Guidelines - <http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/guidelines.shtml> Unsubscribe - <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> WAMUG is powered by Stalker CommuniGatePro

