Hi Alan, Hi Ronni, Hi Daniel,

Just a couple of thoughts/comments on using a separate user account and on
partitioning.


Using a separate user account to segregate your temporary backup data

I tend to be the only user of my main computer and, in the past, I have used
the approach of separate user accounts to segregate distinct areas of my
work ­ in my case this was:
* Me (main user) all my usual personal computing
* Potoroo ­ all the work I do as a committee member and webmaster of a
not-for-profit community organisation
* Genealogy ­ all the research, documents, images etc relating to my ongoing
family history investigations

In the (really) old days before OSX, I just used to cover this with various
levels of cascading folders in my main DATA folder ­ but as OSX took over
Apple really pushed you in the direction of higher level splitting into
Documents/Pictures/Music/Movies etc. My first approach was that, rather than
creating three different (me/potoroo/genealogy) sets of subfolders in each
of the main Apple Documents/Pictures/Music/Movies folders, I would create
the three user accounts and just log into or switch to the relevant user
account depending on the work I was doing.

In practice, I soon found lots of problems with this approach ­ I won¹t
bother highlighting them all as most of them wouldn¹t be relevant to your
proposed use of the separate user account ­ the big one that, I think, could
be a problem for you is User permissions. Ronni has written excellent
articles on user permissions before ­ so I won¹t try and go into the details
- and possibly introduce some errors ;o)

The thing is that Apple envisages user folders being used by different users
­ who don¹t want all their stuff being accessible to other users ­ so when
you are logged in as one user you (generally) don¹t have access to stuff you
created when logged in as a separate user. What permissions a file gets also
can vary whether you move it on the same disc/partition, copy it, or move it
to another disc/partition (which will generally/always? Leave the original
in place and create a copy on the second disc/partition).

Now there are ways around this, from using public folders to changing folder
and file permissions, and I always found a way to access the files I needed
to ­ but it DID become very tiresome ­ so the next time I did a major system
update, I reverted to one user for ALL my work and relied on an organised
filing system to keep track of it all (I do have a separate Computer Admin
user account that I can use for troubleshooting ­ but that is a different
use/purpose and that account does not hold any of my data/documents).

You say you are wanting a ³temporary² backup storage area and I¹m not sure
exactly how you intend to move stuff into this and (perhaps more
importantly) how you intend to access it if you need to use the back-ups ­
so I don¹t know how much of a problem permissions issues would be to you ­
but if you find you NEED the backup, it would be a bad time to discover
permissions issues.

If it was me, I would not create a new user account ­ instead I would just
create a new high level folder (called, say, temporary backups) and use that
to store the sparse images. I¹m still on Snow Leopard and the main file
structure will no doubt have changed somewhat through Mavericks and
Yosemite, but the obvious option on my set-up would be a new folder, called
temporary backups, in users/shared ­ since it is outside your actual
personal user folder it is separated (as a new user folder would be) ­ but
still owned by you ­ so without the potential permissions/access problems).

On my set-up I could even create a new folder at the top level of the disc
(ie alongside library, System, Users etc) which would put it even more
³out-of-the way²  - however, personally, I prefer to leave this level clean,
with just the Apple created folder hierarchy.

Just my personal observations/experience/preferences ­ others may well feel
differently ­ you need to find what works best for you.



Using separate partitions on the main computer HD

I would not dream of disagreeing with Daniel¹s and Ronni¹s comments ­
partitions were much more useful/used in the past when storage was much more
expensive. Having said that, I DO have my HD partitioned ;o)

I initially had my HD partitioned into 3:

1. Main OSX and all user data/documents
2. Insurance back-ups from other computers
3. TV programs (downloaded video from iView and other sources)

But, as Daniel mentioned, I fairly soon ran into partition size problems
(particularly 2) so I purchased more external drives to cover all the
back-ups, deleted partition 2 and re-organised to just have the 2
partitions:

1. Main OSX and all user data/documents
2. TV programs (downloaded video from iView and other sources)


The main advantage, I find, is that I have quite different back-up
needs/schedules for the two partitions:
* Partition 1 is my digital ³life² it has 2 Superduper clones on separate
external drives and timemachine back-up. In addition, all the important
documents are synched to dropbox (and hence to 2 other computers ­ which
also have back-ups). You might say the approach is belt & braces & piece of
string ­ on 3 pairs of trousers ;o)
* Partition 2 contains a lot of data and represents a fair bit of
time/effort in collecting it ­ it would be frustrating and annoying to lose
it, but hardly a tragedy. I have a superduper clone of this on a separate
external HD, which I update after adding a bunch of new content. I am happy
with just one clone and no time machine back-up ­ it¹s just TV programs.

I COULD have all this on one partition, exclude the TV stuff from Time
machine, and set-up more complex superduper scripts for back-up. But I do
find the two partition set-up the most convenient for me, at present. Having
said that, I can envisage myself setting up a network drive, attached
directly to the router, and ending up with video and music on that ­ and
leaving the computer clean of all that (and with just one partition).

I have had no problems with my partitioning ­ but I DO research carefully
how it all works, read several ³how-to²s including Apple¹ and Ronni¹s and
make sure I know exactly what I am going to do BEFORE I start. It goes
without saying that everything has back-ups before doing any of this ­ but
you are obviously a conscientious baker-upper and well-aware of these needs
;o)

Again just my personal observations/experience/preferences ­ others may well
feel differently ­ you need to find what works best for you.




Cheers



Neil
-- 
Neil R. Houghton
Albany, Western Australia
Tel: +61 8 9841 6063
Email: [email protected]




on 14/12/14 20:44, Alan Smith at [email protected] wrote:

> Hi Daniel
> 
> Thanks for your input.  Yes, I¹ve had the problem of partitions ending up the
> wrong size down the track.
> 
> I wanted a ³temporary² backup storage area as several ³spare² external drives
> have data relating to the 2009 iMac in its various stages of decline and
> recovery.  I don¹t want to delete them yet.
>   
> I decided on the sparse image approach because SuperDuper erases the target
> disk as part of its process - and I didn¹t want that going on near the boot
> drive. I decided that I could put several images in the one partition, which
> could be moved one at a time if space became an issue.
> 
> However, I am now thinking that my security needs (fumble fingers, not web
> probes!) could be improved by putting the sparse images in the standard
> structure of a second (bold, italic and underline!) user account.  The images
> only need accessing once a month in normal times.  May keep them there, and
> not worry about external drives at all Š
> 
> Cheers
> Alan
> 
> 
> On 14 Dec 2014, at 7:22 pm, Daniel Kerr <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> You can create one partition on a Fusion drive, after that ,Šno.
>> More info here. - http://support.apple.com/en-au/HT202574
>> My personal opinion on partitions on internal drives,Šand again I point
>> out,..this is my personal opinion, I think partitions are a waste of time.
>> You're not gaining any benefit with a partition, and nine times out of ten,
>> down the track either Part A or Part B of the partition is the "wrong size".
>> Then you have to go back to square one.
>> Generally just easier to a) get another external drive as a backup (as
>> externals are cheap), as you'll spend less "money time" on it and can get
>> larger sizes,Šor just create a backup folder to back up to.
>> There's no real "benefit" in partitioning I findŠnot these days. It's not
>> like if one partition dies it's not going to affect the other partition, as
>> it's the same driveŠŠ.
>> 
>> Again, just my take on it,Š..
>> 
>> Kind regards
>> Daniel
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone 6
>> 
>> ---
>> Daniel Kerr
>> MacWizardry
>> 
>> Phone: 0414 795 960
>> Email: <daniel AT macwizardry.com.au>
>> Web:   <http://www.macwizardry.com.au>
>> 
>> 
>> **For everything Apple**
>> 
>> NOTE: Any information provided in this email may be my personal opinion and
>> as such should be taken accordingly, and may not be the views of MacWizardry.
>> Any information provided does not offer or warrant any form of warranty or
>> accept liability. It would be appreciated that if any information in this
>> email is to be disseminated, distributed or copied, that permission by the
>> author be requested.
>> 
>> On 13/12/2014, at 1:04 PM, Alan Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> I would like to utilise some of the vast unused space on the internal drives
>>> of two iMacs as backups for films.    Is this possible?   If it is possible
>>> then what is the downside?   Could such a partition be later removed to
>>> restore the space to OS X?   I do not want to go through the disk-erase and
>>> OS X re-install operation!
>>> 
>>> My concept is to use SuperDuper to create a sparse image (which permits
>>> smart updates) of some of the films on a USB 3 external drive.     In
>>> practice I would use say three sparse images for ease of management.
>>> 
>>> iMac 1 (2012) has 1TB with Fusion Drive.  iMac 2 (2009) has a standard 1TB
>>> drive.  I would prefer to use the Fusion Drive iMac for the backups.  Both
>>> iMacs have Mavericks installed, and hence should also have Recovery
>>> partitions.   (If an OS X upgrade or Boot Camp can install partitions, why
>>> not me??)
>>> 
>>> I have assumed a partition would be needed, but can a sparse image simply be
>>> used as a file within the ŒMacintosh HD¹ OS X startup volume structure?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Regards, 
>>> Alan
>>> 
>>> Alan Smith
>>> Late 2012 iMac 27" Intel Quad Core i5  Fusion 3.2GHz 8G RAM - OSX 10.9.5
>>> Mavericks
>>> Late 2009 iMac 21.5" Intel Core 2 Duo 3.06GHz 12G RAM - OSX 10.9.5 Mavericks
>>> iPhone5;  iPad2;  ATV2


-- The WA Macintosh User Group Mailing List --
Archives - <http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/archives.shtml>
Guidelines - <http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/guidelines.shtml>
Settings & Unsubscribe - <http://lists.wamug.org.au/listinfo/wamug.org.au-wamug>