Sebelum jadi bias masalahnya karena usaha ngaburnya dan ulah ngeyel HMNA serta tuduhannya, ini saya ulang postingnya...
================ Oh, oh, ternyata lagi-lagi HMNA cuma sanggup menghadirkan cerita, ya sekedar cerita...tidak ada bukti kebenaran omongan kawan Anda itu. Nah, sekarang saya berikan bukti dari situs resmi Ahmadiyah Lahore dimana Hz. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad a.s. dengan jelas mengatakan bahwa dirinya adalah nabi dan rasul. Lihat di: http://www.aaiil.org/text/books/mga/correctionerrorekghaltikaizala/tr anslationcorrectionerror.shtml Mirza Ghulam Ahmad menjelaskan dalam buku Ek Ghalati Ka Izala sbb: "Some people in our Movement who are not well-acquainted with my claim and the arguments relating to it --- not having had the occasion to study my books carefully, nor having stayed in my company for a sufficient length of time to complete their knowledge - -- in some instances in response to an objection of the opponents give a reply which is entirely against facts. So, despite being on the side of truth, they have to face embarrassment. Thus it happened a few days ago that a person faced from an opponent the objection that "the man whose pledge you have taken claims to be a prophet (nabi) and a messenger (rasul)". This was answered by only a denial, while such an answer is not correct. The fact is that the holy revelation of God Almighty which descends upon me contains words such as rasul, mursal and nabi, not once but hundreds of times. So how can the reply be correct that such words are not present? In fact, at this time these words occur more clearly and explicitly than in the earlier days. And in the Barahin Ahmadiyya too, published 22 years ago, these words are not few. Thus, in the Divine communications published in Barahin Ahmadiyya, one revelation from God is as follows: "He it is Who sent His messenger (rasul) with guidance and the true religion in order to make it prevail over all other religions" (see p. 498, Barahin Ahmadiyya). Here, this humble one has been clearly addressed as rasul. Then after this, in the same book, is the following Divine revelation regarding myself: "The messenger of God in the mantle of the prophets" (p. 504). Then quite near this in the same book is the following revelation: "Muhammad is the messenger of God; those with him are firm against disbelievers, compassionate among themselves. (The Holy Quran: 48:29)" In this revelation I have been given the name 'Muhammad'2 as well as rasul.4 Then there is the following Divine revelation noted on page 557 of Barahin Ahmadiyya: "A warner came into the world." Another version of it is: "A prophet (nabi) came into the world."5 Similarly in many other places in Barahin Ahmadiyya the word rasul has been applied to this humble one..." Dan seterusnya. Oh, oh, makin kelihatan saja HMNA tidak mengerti apa yang ia dengar dan ia omongkan. Salam, MAS --- In wanita-muslimah@yahoogroups.com, "H. M. Nur Abdurrahman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Saya sudah forward ini kepada salah seorang sahabat saya penganut Islam > Ahmadiyah Lahore, seorang kristolog dan jawabannya sederhana saja: "Tidak > ada pengakuan Ghulam Ahmad sebagai nabi dalam tulisan itu, dan tulisan itu > wajar sebagai pernyataan seorang 'Mujaddid'. Lain kali kalau menjumpai > tulisan, lihat saja, kalau ada pengakuan sebagai nabi, niscaya itu bukan > dari Ghulam Ahmad, itu palsu.. Sebagai perbandingan: LAI- Yahya 17:3 Inilah > hidup yang kekal itu, yaitu bahwa mereka mengenal Engkau, satu- satunya Allah > yang benar, dan mengenal Yesus Kristus yang telah Engkau utus. LAI- Rom 10:9 > Sebab jika kamu mengaku dengan mulutmu, bahwa Yesus adalah Tuhan, dan > percaya dalam hatimu, bahwa Allah telah membangkitkan Dia dari antara orang > mati, maka kamu akan diselamatkan..LAI- Yahya 17:3 yang menyatakan Jesus > hanya sekadar utusan Allah, itu betul-betul dari Jesus, tetapi LAI- Rom 10:9 > yang menyatakan Jesus adalah Tuhan, itu palsu, bukan perkataan Jesus. > HMNA > #####################################################################
