http://english.aljazeera.net/news/europe/2009/06/2009622154955406217.html
UPDATED ON:
Monday, June 22, 2009
20:24 Mecca time, 17:24 GMT
Sarkozy says burqas 'not welcome'
Nearly 60 legislators have proposed a parliamentary
commission to look into the spread of the burqa [AFP]
Nicolas Sarkozy, the French president, has said that the burqa, a garment
worn by many Muslim women, has no place in France as it was a sign of the
subjugation of women.
The burqa is a garment that covers women from head to toe and hides their
faces.
During a speech to a joint session of both houses of parliament on
Monday, held at the Palace of Versailles in Paris, Sarkozy backed an initiative
launched by legislators last week who expressed concern over an increase in the
use of burqas in France.
"The issue of the burqa is not a religious issue, it is a question of
freedom and of women's dignity," he said.
"The burqa is not a religious sign, it is a sign of the subjugation, of
the submission of women. I want to say solemnly that it will not be welcome on
our territory."
Referring to a cross-party initiative by nearly 60 legislators, who
proposed a parliamentary commission to look into the spread of the burqa and
find ways to combat the trend, Sarkozy said it was the right way to proceed.
"A debate has to take place and all views must be expressed. What better
place than parliament for this? I tell you, we must not be ashamed of our
values, we must not be afraid of defending them," he said.
Headscarf controversy
The debate about the burqa is reminiscent of a controversy that raged for
a decade in France about Muslim girls wearing headscarves in class.
Eventually, a law was passed in 2004 banning pupils from wearing
conspicuous signs of their religion at state schools.
Critics say the law stigmatised Muslims at a time when France should have
been fighting discrimination in the job and housing markets.
Sarkozy's comments, which were part of a major policy address, came in
the first speech in 136 years to a joint session of France's parliament.
It follows a constitutional amendment narrowly passed last year to make
such a speech to both houses possible.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
