Last update - 11:22 07/04/2010     
      Israel seizing hundreds of millions of shekels meant for Palestinian 
      By Chaim Levinson 

            For the past 15 years, Israel has been channeling hundreds of 
millions of shekels it had collected in the West Bank into its state coffers. 
The move is considered illegal, since international law prohibits an occupying 
power from appropriating the fruit of economic activity in an occupied 

            Following protests by military lawyers, the deputy attorney general 
has ruled that the practice should be stopped and ordered an inquiry into 
whether the Civil Administration in the West Bank should be compensated 

            "Following staff work by an interministerial team composed of 
representatives of the Finance Ministry, Justice Ministry and Civil 
Administration, it has been agreed that the ... said fees will be entered into 
the Civil Administration's budget. The technical aspects of the affair will be 
sorted out in the coming weeks." 
            The funds in question are collected by the Civil Administration, 
overwhelmingly from Israelis. They include fees and levies for various 
activities such as royalties from quarries and levies on public auctions. The 
sums are estimated in the hundreds of millions of shekels, sometimes reaching 
as much as NIS 80 million a year. 

            Until the Oslo Accords in the 1990s, the funds were transferred to 
the Civil Administration to be used for operational expenses as well as for 
infrastructure and welfare services for Palestinians in the territories. The 
Oslo Accords dictated the closing down of the administration, the funds in 
question were reclassified as income to the Israel Lands Administration and 
were redirected to state coffers. 

            The Civil Administration, however, continued to operate in Area C 
of the West Bank, working on infrastructure, planning and construction. The 
funds are still channeled to the state, although international law prohibits an 
occupying power from appropriating the fruit of economic activity in an 
occupied territory. Funds collected in American-occupied areas of Iraq, for 
example, are channeled to the United States, and, except for 5 percent that 
goes to Kuwait, are returned for direct investment in Iraq. 

            Budget ramifications 

            Recently, a lawyer at the Military Advocate General's Office said 
the transfer of such funds to the state was improper. Because the issue is 
complex and has budget ramifications far beyond the military, the authorities 
entrusted the inquiry to Deputy Attorney General Malchiel Blas. 

            He ruled that the direct transfer of the funds to the state budget 
should cease. A team that includes officials from the treasury, Justice 
Ministry and Civil Administration is now examining the implications of Blas' 

            At the team's meetings, the Civil Administration has requested that 
the money again be directly channeled to its coffers. The Finance Ministry, by 
contrast, proposed that a fund be set up for the money, which would be divided 
among various ministries investing in the territories, such the transportation, 
agriculture and industry, trade and labor ministries. 

            Another question facing the team is whether the Civil 
Administration should be compensated for the funds it lost to the state. The 
Finance Ministry is strongly opposed, and claims that in the past 15 years the 
state has invested in the West Bank, apart from the settlements, more than 
double the amount it has collected. The government will make the final 

            "This income was registered as part of state income, and the 
Finance Ministry budgeted all the activities of the Civil Administration and 
the military in the area out of the state budget," the Justice Ministry said in 
a statement. 

            "Recently ... it turned out that the issue should be arranged in a 
way that would make it obvious that the income should be registered as part of 
the Civil Administration's budget, as authorized by the Knesset." 

            The Finance Ministry said: "It should be noted the question of 
whether the funds are registered as state income or Civil Administration income 
is a technical question, because at the end of the day the State of Israel 
invests in the area amounts considerably larger than the fees it collects.  


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Kirim email ke