/=-=-=-=-Click Here & Support Our Sponsor-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=\
This Christmas, give them what they REALLY want!
eHobbies has the coolest gifts for every budget.
We also gift wrap and have a FREE SHIPPING promotion!
>From: JS Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Be honest and admit rather that
>your argument is that you disagree with their interpretation.
That's simply not true.
The FL SC ruled that recounts should include dimpled and pregnant chads.
First, no such law exists, so that's an arbitrary theft of power by the
Court from the Legislature. Second, dimpled and pregnant chads are NOT
indications of votes. They can just as easily be damage from handling while
the voters are waiting in line (fingernails cause dimples/moisture causes
pregnant chads... as the patent holder testified).
>And I have greater faith in the Florida jurists and the Supreme Court
>jurists to interpret the law than I have in your abilities to do the same.
>If you think we should follow the law, you have to accept who the arbiters
>of the law are in this country - that's the law, too, you know. Marbury vs.
INTERPRET law..... not make it.
Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com
To Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Make A Buck Or Two @ TheMail.com - Free Internet Email
Sign-up today at http://www.themail.com/ref.htm?ref=126357
referrer name = john_t Check it out! It works!
T O P I C A http://www.topica.com/t/17
Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite Topics