On Friday, 16 June 2006 at 15:11, Dennis Schridde wrote: > What I don't like about that approach, is that inevitably all source files > will be build. That makes it impossible to have different renderers (sw/hw)
Not if the files are in different directories, you can just add the needed directory depending on which version you want. > and also makes it complicated to not compile some file. Right. I think I can change that, if it's deemed necessary. > (We currently have files in the repos which wont ever be built.) I had no problems with that in my tests (that was one of the reasons for my file rename/remove mails a while ago). And I don't think it's useful to keep unused files around (well, maybe put them in an 'attic' directory where they won't bother anyone if you need to keep them for whatever reason). > I'll try using waf (was searching for a big testcase for some time now ;) ) > It would only need Python... (No shell, no Perl, no Autohell, only Python) > (Am not sure if this is good, either...) Damn, still no agreement, but a whole new system I haven't even heard of before... Is it possible to replace both the autostuff and Makefile.raw systems with waf, so there is only one build system? -- I remember Ulysses well... Left one day for the post office to mail a letter, met a blonde named Circe on the streetcar, and didn't come back for 20 years. _______________________________________________ Warzone-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
