Am Montag, 21. August 2006 16:01 schrieb Christian Ohm: > On Monday, 21 August 2006 at 15:35, Dennis Schridde wrote: > > Am Montag, 21. August 2006 14:21 schrieb Per Inge Mathisen: > > > On 8/21/06, Dennis Schridde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Currently opinions on what we actually call ourselves seem to differ > > > > a lot. There is "Warzone Resurrection", "Warzone (Re)Development", > > > > "Warzone 2100", "Warzone 2100 GPL" and probably others. > > > > > > The project's name is "Warzone Resurrection", everything else is > > > obsolete. The game is still "Warzone 2100". > > > > So no GPL in it? (I saw that in Rod's installers I think). Ok. > > I'd keep the 'GPL' part to distinguish it from the commercial version > (might save some (OK, probably not many) of those "Why don't the movies > work?" questions). >
> > > > Now we need to find exactly one clear and easy name for the project > > > > and our executable files. > > > > > > > > The package is currently called games-strategy/warzone2100 on Gentoo > > > > and seemingly Debian wants to name it similar. Thus they also want to > > > > rename the exe to warzone2100. > > > > > > Fine by me. Do we have a final answer for this? > > So we rename our binary to warzone2100 ? > > > > So we got: > > Package name: Warzone 2100 > > Project (creators) name: Warzone Resurrection > > Binary name: warzone2100 > > Correct? > > > > Shall we occupy /usr/share/warzone2100 then? (We need to keep consistent) Does anyone have objections against this? Otherwise I'll commit patches to change all those names. --Dennis
pgpf83bP5cb3E.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Warzone-dev mailing list Warzone-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
