On 1/7/07, Giel van Schijndel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anyway if nobody objects (yes, read that in your opinion the sound code isn't crappy, no specifics however, so if you object please clarify), I'll create a (temporary(?)) branch somewhere tomorrow (i.e. after 1300 CET, cause I won't be available, read awake ;-) , very early before that time) for a reimplementation.
Are you sure it is less effort (for you) to create and maintain a branch, than just work on it in a local tree? Syncing branches is a lot of work, and I do not recommend it unless you actually need it, say for coordinating several developers. Making a branch for just one person to work on, I would find pretty pointless and a waste of time.
I'd prefer to do this using C++ (I'll obviously provide a C interface so that linking against the new lib will be possible for C), please also say so when you don't like that idea.
I do not like that idea at all. Why start adding C++ to the codebase? I do not see a technical reason for this, and it makes things more complicated to maintain. - Per _______________________________________________ Warzone-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
