Per Inge Mathisen schreef: > On 4/24/07, Giel van Schijndel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> * Turn some implicit conversions of void* to something* into an explicit >> cast >> > Is that really necessary? Can't you use some switch to turn such > warnings off instead? It is ugly, and makes maintenance harder. Void > was meant as a generic pointer that was not in need of casting. I do > not understand why C++ should not get that. > In case of malloc it was already used at most locations.
Btw on the topic of C++ not liking void, it simply doesn't like void pointers because those violate type safety. -- Giel
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Warzone-dev mailing list Warzone-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
