Zarel schreef: > 2008/9/25 Giel van Schijndel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Hi all, >> >> In the "Vote for what you think is best" thread we seemed to have >> reached some form of agreement on releasing both 2.1 beta5 alongside a >> 2.2 beta/alpha/thingy directly from trunk or a release branch otherwise. >> >> In any case, I'm starting this thread for one reason only. I think we >> should tag of 2.1_beta5 and start the "release cycle" for that ASAP >> (i.e. a tag and tarball should be available by the end of the weekend). >> >> Any objections or "votes" in favour? > > So are we going to fix pathing in 2.1b5?
Fixed already, at the cost of breaking savegames made with 2.1_beta4. (Which was the cause for this whole discussion.) > Heck, why don't we just backport the threaded pathing from 2.2? That > can't be worse than the other pathing fix. Backporting the threaded path finding proved next to impossible, which is the reason for the above fix which broke loading of 2.1_beta4 savegames. -- Giel
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Warzone-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
